Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 29;203(1):163–172. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07094-9

Table 3.

Concordance between Prosigna® assay and IHC classifications: Proxy 1, Proxy 2, and Proxy 3 [57]

Proxy 1 (n = 1028) Prosigna®
LumA LumB
LumA 391 (38%) 65 (6%) Kappa 95% CI Accuracy TPR TNR
LumB 287 (28%) 285 (28%) 0.34 (0.288–0.390) 0.66 0.58 0.81
Proxy 2 (n = 990) Prosigna®
LumA LumB
LumA 300 (30%) 45 (5%) Kappa 95% CI Accuracy TPR TNR
LumB 352 (36%) 293 (30%) 0.27 (0.221–0.315) 0.59 0.46 0.87
Proxy 3 (n = 1020) Prosigna®
LumA LumB
LumA 490 (49%) 117 (11%) Kappa 95% CI Accuracy TPR TNR
LumB 185 (18%) 228 (22%) 0.37 (0.311–0.427) 0.70 0.73 0.66

IHC immunohistochemistry, CI confidence interval, LumA luminal A, LumB luminal B, TPR true positive rate, TNR true negative rate