Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 22;11(4):204–211. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.08.001

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients according to prostate volume groups; <40 mL (n = 67), 40–80 mL (n = 200), and ≥80 mL (n = 131)

Variable Group 1 ePV <40 mL (n = 67) Group 2 ePV 40–80 mL (n = 200) Group 3 ePV ≥80 mL (n = 131) P
Age (year) 72 (66–78) 71 (65–77) 73 (66–78) 0.637
BMI (kg/m2) 23.8 (21.8–25.7) 24.1 (22.6–26.1) 24.6 (22.6–26.5) 0.174
HTN 35 (52.2%) 100 (50.0%) 67 (51.1%) 0.945
DM 15 (22.4%) 43 (21.5%) 33 (25.2%) 0.733
Neurologic disease 12 (17.9%) 29 (14.5%) 26 (19.8%) 0.431
Cardiovascular disease 16 (23.9%) 34 (17.0%) 19 (14.5%) 0.253
CKD 4 (6.0%) 5 (2.5%) 9 (6.9%) 0.143
History of AUR 11 (16.4%) 54 (27.0%) 54 (41.2%) 0.001
Prior AP/AC therapy 21 (31.3%) 52 (26.0%) 43 (32.8%) 0.373
PSA (ng/mL) 1.28 (0.63–2.50) 2.62 (1.57–6.14) ∗ 7.68 (4.62–12.11) ∗ <0.001
BPH-related drugs 58 (86.6%) 189 (94.5%) 110 (84.0%) 0.006
Alpha-blockers 37 (55.2%) 87 (43.5%) 62 (47.3%) 0.008
5-ARIs 1 (1.5%) 8 (4.0%) 4 (3.1%)
Combination 20 (29.9%) 94 (47.0%) 44 (33.6%)
ePV (mL) 34.0 (28.0–37.8) 57.0 (48.9–68.0) ∗ 102.7 (91.1–128.0) ∗ <0.001
IPSS total score 23.0 (19.0–28.0) 19.0 (13.0–26.0) ∗ 17.0 (12.0–25.0) ∗ 0.010
IPSS voiding subscore 14.0 (11.5–19.0) 12.0 (7.0–16.0) ∗ 11.0 (6.5–15.0) ∗ 0.001
IPSS storage subscore 8.0 (5.5–12.0) 8.0 (5.0–11.0) 8.0 (4.5–11.0) 0.553
IPSS QoL score 5.0 (4.0–6.0) 4.0 (3.3–5.0) ∗ 4.0 (3.0–5.0) ∗ 0.001
Qmax (mL/s) 9.0 (6.5–12.0) 9.0 (6.0–12.0) 9.0 (6.0–11.0) 0.712
PVR (mL) 45.0 (13.8–95.0) 64.0 (30.0–115.0) 112.0 (58.0–166.5) ∗ <0.001

ePV, estimated prostate volume; BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; CKD, chronic kidney disorder; AUR, acute urinary retention; AP/AC, antiplatelet/anticoagulant; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; BPH, benign prostate hyperplasia; 5-ARI, 5-alpha reductase inhibitor; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; QoL, quality of life; Qmax, maximum flow rate; PVR, post-void residual volume; VV, voided volume. Data presented are median (interquartile range) or number (%). In post hoc analysis, the statistical significance was considered when the Bonferroni adjusted p value was less than 0.017. ∗p < 0.017 vs. Group 1, †p < 0.017 vs. Group 2.