Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 8;24:33. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04613-7

Table 3.

Key study findings (N = 62)

Authors (Year) [Ref.#] Intervention Duration Interven-tionist Key Findings
Intervention Studies
Little et al., (1997) [53] Five 90-minute oral hygiene classes to intervention group. Control group: usual care 4 mos Dental hygienist Brushing frequency & skills margi-nally better in treatment group, but mean % sites with plaque, gingival bleeding & bleeding after probing were similar in both groups
Mojon et al. (1998) [54] Educational sessions (Oral hygiene courses) to healthcare providers & regular calls to residents. Control group treated by dentist with mobile equipment by request 18 mos Dental hygienist
Simons et al. (2001) [55] Chlorhexidine acetate/ xylitol gum. Control group: usual care 12 mos Not clear Improved plaque & gingival scores with chlorhexidine/ xylitol gum
Engfors et al. (2004) [56] 5-year clinical & radiologic performances of fixed implant-supported prostheses (Retrospective) Retrospective study (5 years) Not clear The result of Implant treatment among the older adults & younger age group were comparable.
Mariño et al. (2004) [57] ORHIS implemented (incl. Access to services & referrals). Control group: usual care 12 mos Not clear ORHIS approach significantly improved oral health attitudes, knowledge & behaviours on oral care
Wyatt et al. (2004) [58] Application of 15 ml of either 0.2% neutral NaF or 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate. Control group: placebo 24 mos Dentist Reduced incidence of caries
Peltola et al. (2007) [59] Group A: tooth cleaning (electric toothbrushes & interdental brushes) by dental hygiene students; group B: same services by dental hygienist trained nurses. Control usual care. 11 mos Dental hygienist (students) Nurse Intervention group B performed best in terms of improved denture & dental hygiene
Hakuta et al. (2008) [60] Intervention participants received educational sessions & encourage-ment for facial muscle & tongue exercise, & salivary gland massages. Control gtoup received usual care 3 mos Dental hygienist Reduced tongue coating scores, organoleptic score for oral mal-odours & food debris in oral cavity. Improved tongue dryness, lip movement & clearer pronunciation
Baca et al. (2009) [61] Application of a chlorhexidine-thymol varnish. Control group = Placebo group 12 mos Dentist Reduced incidence of root caries lesions
Tan et al. (2010) [62] 4 different methods: i) individualized OHI; ii) OHI & 1% chlorhexidine varnish every 3 mos; iii) OHI & 5% sodium fluoride varnish every 3 mos; iv) OHI & annual 38% SDF solution 36 mos Unclear SDF solution, sodium fluoride varnish & chlorhexidine varnish more effective in preventing new root caries lesions than oral health instructions alone
Blinkhorn et al. (2011) [63] Design & produce oral hygiene trolley, develop protocol & educate staff. Comparison between baseline & endline 12 mos Nurse Dentist Dietician Reduced plaque & gingivitis scores & pocket depths
Tashiro et al. (2011) [64] Pre-post-intervention in 3 groups i) oral cleaning by toothbrushing alone; ii) tongue coat removal using sponge brush; iii) wiping oral mucosa with gargling solution containing chlorhexidine gluconate 5 conse-cutive days every 3 weeks Dentist Dental hygienist Improved oral malodour; decreased plaque & gingival index scores
Mariño et al., (2013) [65] A series of oral health seminars & 4 supervised brushing sessions at club premises. Control group: usual care 6 mos Not clear Improved gingival status & self-efficacy, but no effect regarding dental plaque
Van Der Putten et al., (2013) [66] The supervised “oral health care Guideline for older people in long-term care institutions” (OGOLI) was introduced to the intervention arm. Control group: usual care 6 mos Dental hygienist Improved dental plaque scores
Zenthofer et al. (2013) [67] Professional cleaning of teeth & dentures. Control group: usual care 3 mos Dentist Improved dental hygiene, plaque & gingival index scores
Zhang et al. (2013) [68] 2 groups: i) OHI & SDF; ii) OHI & SDF, plus OHE. Control group: OHI 24 mos Dentist Dental hygienist Intervention group had greater num-ber of active root caries surfaces that became arrested than control group
Bonwell et al. (2014) [69] Two 45-mintes in-service training sessions with demonstrations to health care providers. Pre- & post-test comparison 3 mos interval Periodon-tist, Oral pathologist, Pharmacist, Dietitian Occupatio-nal therapist ~ 80% of the 145 participants indicated they would make a change in patient care
Morino et al. (2014) [70] Professional oral health care & toothbrushing. Control group: usual care 5 mos Dental hygienists Improved dental plaque score
Kammers et al. (2015) [71] Application of adapted toothbrush handles. Control group: conventional toothbrush 0.75 mos Dentist Reduction in biofilm coverage among those using adapted toothbrush handles
Khanagar et al. (2015) [72] Educational sessions (through PowerPoint). Control group: usual care 6 mos Not clear Improved oral health knowledge of caregivers & reduced scores for plaque, debris, denture plaque & denture stomatitis
Komulainen et al. (2015) [73] Intervention group received individually tailored personal guidance in dental & denture hygiene. Control group: usual care 24 mos Dentist Dental hygienist Improved oral health among intervention group compared to control
Ohara et al., (2015) [74] Intervention group received OHE programs. Control group received pamphlets describing only general information about oral health 3 mos Dental hygienist Improved resting salivation, second & third swallowing times as well as taste sensitivity for bitterness
Kim et al. (2016) [75] Oral health promotion program (Combined Watanabe method & oral functional exercise). Control group: usual care Not clear Not clear Improved oral hygiene & oral function scores
Mariño et al. (2016) [76] Pre- & post-ORHIS model via com-puter interactive presentations; no direct role of oral health professionals 12 mos Not clear Significantly improved oral health attitudes, knowledge & self-efficacy & self-reported oral hygiene practices
Avellaneda et al. (2017) [77] Educational sessions & demon-strations on oral care & tooth brushing techniques. Comparison between baseline & endline 6 mos Dental students assessed by panel of experts Reduced plaque & gingival scores
Deutsch et al. (2017) [78] Educational sessions & training to nurses in oral assessments & saliva testing & develop care plan. Com-parison between baseline & endline 10 weeks Oral health therapists Enhanced competencies of nurses so they could choose the appropriate intervention similar to oral health therapists
Ildarabadi et al. (2017) [79] Educational session through training. Control group: usual care 2 mos Not clear Improved oral health status
Nihtila et al. (2017) [80] Oral/written dental hygiene instruc-tions & cleaning of oral mucosa provided to participants/caregivers/ nurses. Control group: usual care 6 mos Dental hygienist Improved denture hygiene & reduced number of plaque-covered teeth
Sakashita et al. (2017) [81] Knowledge, skill & experience sharing on self-care. Private consul-tation to manage condition through oral examination. Baseline, 3- & 6-mos intervention comparisons 6 mos Nurse, Dentist Dental hygienist Improved use of dental floss & interdental brushing, Community Periodontal Index scores & deposits of plaque & oral & physical quality of life
Schwindling et al. (2017) [82] Educational sessions & practical training (different types of prosthe-tic restorations) for care-givers. Control group: no intervention 12 mos Dentist Improved plaque & gingival bleeding scores
Fjeld et al. (2018) [83] New toothbrush by own preference & application of 1450 ppm NaF toothpaste 12 mos Dentist, Dental hygienist No differences in plaque scores between manual and electric toothbrush
Janssens et al. (2018) [84] Educational sessions & implemen-tation of oral healthcare guideline. Comparison between baseline & FU 22.5 mos (Mean) Dentist Reduced proportion of oral health incident treatment need
Lavigne et al. (2018) [85] Twice-daily use of a rotating-oscillating power toothbrush. Control group: usual care 1.5 mos Dental hygienist Reduced periodontal inflammation including reduction in bleeding
Marchini et al. (2018) [86] Group 1) Educational session; 2) educational session plus application of chlorhexidine varnish. Control group: usual oral hygiene practice 6 mos Dental hygienist No clinical differences recorded in clinical or microbiological outcomes
Seleskog et al. (2018) [87] Individualized guidance & support for each resident. Control group: usual care 3 mos Dental hygienist Improved plaque levels in older adults; enhanced capacity of nursing staff to perform proper oral care
Berniyanti et al., (2019) [88] Counselling about dental & oral health materials & ways of brushing toothless jaws Not clear Not clear Average improvement of knowledge & application of toothbrushing method
Iwao et al. (2019) [89] Educational sessions & demonstra-tions on physical exercise, oral health & nutritional guidance. Com-parison between baseline & endline 3 mos Dental hygienist This intervention may contribute to healthy aging in older people
Keyong et al. (2019) [90] OHE & demonstration of oral hygiene & denture cleaning, provi-sion of toothbrush & fluoride tooth-paste. Control group: those who did not practice tooth brushing 6 mos Dental nurses Improved oral health perception, lower plaque & gingival & inflammation scores & less clinical attachment loss
Leon et al. (2019) [91] Application of 5000 ppm NaF-dentifrice. Control group: 1450 ppm NaF-dentifrice 24 mos N/A 5000 ppm F-dentifrice more effective than conventional dentifrice in preventing & arresting RCLs
Laurence et al. (2019) [92] Educational sessions for nursing staff. Control group: those not receiving intervention 2 mos Dentist Improved plaque scores
Saleem et al. (2019) [93] Provided lip trainer device to one group, sonic toothbrush to other group & others as control 6 mos Clinician Dental hygienist Lip training device improved salivary flow rates & oral wettability. But less improvement observed among those using a sonic electric toothbrush
Tellez et al. (2019) [94] Motivational interview sessions Not clear Dental hygienist Basic or greater proficiency achieved in improving oral health
Tellez et al. (2019) [95] Motivational interview sessions. Compared with traditional OHE group & control group: usual care 12 mos Dental hygienist Improved oral health self-efficacy (SE) & OHRQL in intervention groups. No change in control group
Ting et al., (2019) [96] Brief OHE program incl. Education materials. Comparison between pre- & post-test 8 mos Not clear Improved GOAHI score. Significant differences for RSST, ODT & CET
Johansson et al. (2020) [97] Educational sessions for nursing staff. Demonstration sessions to each resident. Control group: usual care 3 mos Dental hygienist Nursing staff moderate/high, residents good/acceptable oral health & oral health care-related beliefs at baseline, which was maintained
Konstantopoulou et al. (2020) [98] Educational sessions. Control group: usual care 2 mos Not clear Improved knowledge & attitude
Lee et al. (2020) [99] Professional oral health care program. Control group: usual care 3 mos Dental hygienist Reduced tongue coating, plaque & gingival scores
Lee et al., (2020) [100] Oral health education only to 1 group & other group had additional access to contents of oral health education. Control group received usual care 1.25 mos Not clear Increased oral health knowledge oral health recognition among the intervention group
Ho et al., (2021) [101] Oral health education consisting oral health care for frail older adults, practical sessions on daily oral hygiene care 12 mos Geriatric dentist Dental hygienist Geria-trician Increased oral health awareness amongst health care professionals
Ki et al., (2021) [102] Intervention group received 4 videos on oral exercise, intraoral & extraoral massage & oral hygiene on brushing & denture care methods along with a workbook & a poster. Control group: usual care 1.5 mos Not clear Improved SWAL-QoL, increased tongue pressure & reduced oral dryness
Lee et al., (2021) [103] Oral health education via smartphone app developed in this study & via PowerPoint lectures to non-app users. Control group: usual care 1.25 mo Not clear Improved oral health knowledge & perception & reduced dental plaque & tongue coating scores amongsmartphone users
Northridge et al., (2021) [104] Training on proper toothbrushing & flossing techniques. Encouraged regular dental visits & brushing with fluoride toothpaste & addressed any expressed concerns. Pre- & post-test comparison 1 mo Community health worker > 98% participants strongly agreed/ agreed that CHWs helped them improve taking care of their oral health, answered participants’ questions/concerns & in-person demonstrations were effective to improve oral health
Peroz & Klein (2021) [105] Education sessions & training for staff & oral hygiene treatment for residents. Control group: usual care 1 year Dentist Oral parameters (pocket depth, denture hygiene, mucosal alterations) may be positively influenced
Patel et al. (2021) [106] Fluoride toothpaste use & quarterly fluoride varnish. Comparison between baseline & endline 12 mos

Trained clinician

Dentist Hygienist

Prevented root caries
Pawluk et al. (2021) [107] Educational sessions (Online modules). Comparison between pre- & post-test Not clear Dental hygienist Limited impact on Personal Support Workers’ knowledge & beliefs regarding resident oral health care
Sun et al., (2021) [108] Easy-to-read health education materials with PowerPoint slides. Control group received general text materials on oral health to read 30 minutes after session Not clear Improved oral health literacy
Wanyoni et al., (2021) [109] Text messages on dental & oral care to intervention group. Control group: received leaflet on dental & oral care 2.5 mos Not clear 89% of participants in text arm would recommend the intervention versus 68.2% in the leaflet arm
Observational Studies
Strayer (1991) [110] The intervention program reduced Streptococcus mutans colonisation & caries prevalence N/A N/A Oral health programs for the elderly reported in 30 states (63% of respon-dents). Perceived or documented need for oral health programs for the elderly & lobbying by local advocacy groups were instrumental in implementing or planning such programs
Chalmers et al. (2005) [111] Practical Oral Care video N/A N/A Intervention improved awareness about oral health issues
McAnulla et al., (2018) [112] Poster containing instructions on maintaining oral care & provision of box containing oral hygiene resources N/A N/A Improved awareness of & attention to the oral care of older adults
Lee et al., (2021) [113] Implementation of National Health Insurance Coverage of Dentures for the elderly 2011–2013 N/A Increased denture procedures for older adults and low-income & medical aid beneficiaries
Comparative/ Review Study
Tynan et al. (2018) [114] Integrated oral health program (screening, education & referrals). Control group: facilities without integrated program N/A Oral health therapist Improved compliance with Australian Aged Care Quality Accreditation Standards

CET Cheek expanding test, CHW Community health worker, FU Follow-up, mo(s) Month(s), GOAHI Geriatric/general oral health assessment index, incl. Inclusive, NaF Sodium fluoride, ODT Oral diadochokinesia test, OHE Oral health education, OHI Oral hygiene instructions, OHRQL Oral health-related quality of life, ORHIS Oral health information seminars/sheets, RCL(s) Root caries lesion(s), RSST Repetitive saliva swallowing test, SDF Silver diamine fluoride, SWAL-QoL Swallowing-related quality of life.