Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):e080467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080467

Table 1.

Narrative synthesis—assessment of the relationship between deprivation, the system interval and treatment received

Specific outcome reported Overall assessment/conclusion Studies, n (subjects, n) Studies demonstrating adverse effect of deprivation Studies demonstrating protective effect of deprivation Studies demonstrating no impact of deprivation Further information
Referral to first-seen interval Inconclusive impact of deprivation on the length of the referral to first-seen interval 3 (86 644) 1 strong18 1 strong15
1 weak13
Online supplemental appendix S8: Results of studies reporting variations in the system interval
First-seen to diagnosis interval Inconclusive impact of deprivation on the length of the first-seen to diagnosis interval 1 (15 891) 1 weak13
Referral to treatment interval Inconclusive impact of deprivation on the length of the referral to treatment interval 4 (69 892) 1 strong15 1 strong18
2 weak19 20
Diagnosis to treatment interval Inconclusive impact of deprivation on the length of the diagnosis to treatment interval 5 (292 502) 1 strong15
1 moderate17
1 strong18 2 strong14 16
Test to diagnosis/secondary care diagnostic interval (SCDI) No impact of deprivation on the length of the test to diagnosis/SCDI 2 (68 794) 2 strong12 23
First presentation to diagnosis interval Deprivation associated with increased length of the first presentation to diagnosis interval 3
(at least 6951)
3 strong*21–23 1 strong*23
Symptom to diagnosis interval Inconclusive impact of deprivation on the length of the symptom to diagnosis interval 1 (15 891) 1 weak13
Likelihood of receipt of surgery Strong evidence for reduced surgery with increasing deprivation 11 (374 869) 2 strong*24 36
1 moderate27
4 weak26 28 30 31
1 strong25 1 strong*36
3 weak19 20 29
Online supplemental appendix S9: Results—likelihood of receipt of surgery
Likelihood of receipt of liver resection Strong evidence for reduced liver resection with increasing deprivation 3 (285 194) 3 strong32–34 Online supplemental appendix S9: Results—likelihood of receipt of surgery
Likelihood of receipt of pulmonary resection No impact of deprivation on likelihood of pulmonary resection 1 (80 869) 1 strong35 Online supplemental appendix S9: Results—likelihood of receipt of surgery
Likelihood of receipt of APER Strong evidence for increased likelihood of APER versus AR with increasing deprivation 6 (128 946) 1 strong37
4 weak39–42
1 weak38 Online supplemental appendix S11: Results—likelihood of surgical variation
Likelihood of receipt of TPE No impact of deprivation on likelihood of TPE versus PPE with increasing deprivation 1 (120) 1 weak43 Online supplemental appendix S11: Results—likelihood of surgical variation
Likelihood of receipt of chemotherapy Strong evidence for reduced chemotherapy with increasing deprivation 13 (251 862) 4 strong24 25 44 45
2 moderate*27 47
5 weak*19 26 46 48 50
1 moderate*27
3 weak*20 46 49
Online supplemental appendix S13: Results—likelihood of receipt of chemotherapy
Likelihood of receipt of combination chemotherapy Strong evidence for reduced use of combination chemotherapy with increasing deprivation 1 (8750) 1 strong51 Online supplemental appendix S13: Results—likelihood of receipt of chemotherapy
Likelihood of receipt of radiotherapy No impact of deprivation on likelihood of radiotherapy 7 (79 053) 1 moderate27
1 weak52
1 strong25
4 weak19 20 26 43
Online supplemental appendix S15: Results—likelihood of receipt of radiotherapy
Likelihood of receipt of any treatment Moderate evidence for reduced any treatment with increasing deprivation 2 (90 138) 1 moderate17
1 weak46
Online supplemental appendix S16: Results—likelihood of receipt of any treatment

*Studies represented in more than one column due to different conclusions depending on the underlying cancer type (colon vs rectal cancer).23 27 36 46

APER, abdominoperineal resection; AR, anterior resection; TPE, total pelvic exenteration.