Table 3.

Literature exclusion criteria.

Number	Criteria	Exclusion
1	Secondary Source	Article is a secondary source. Secondary data can distort this analysis by presenting a single model with multiple results.
2	Irrelevant studies	Literature that does not reference infant brain image segmentation, specifically isointense (6–8 months)
3	Publication timeline	2011 and before
4	Document type	Journals (systematic review), review papers, conference proceedings, dissertations, these, white papers, incomplete bibliographic records, industry reports, others on the basis of relevance, chapters in a book, book series, books
5.1	Unavailability	Literature is not available as a full-text article in the selected data source.
5.2		Literature not available in research data source at the time of data collection.
6.1	Inadmissible quality	Literature is not published in a peer-reviewed journal.
6.2		Literature does not adequately or completely its methodology such that it cannot determined how the model was created and evaluated.
6.3		Literature were T1-weighted and T2-weight MRI are not used.
6.4		Literature were fetal MRI imaged was used. (0–5 months).
6.5		Literature were not all 3 tissues (WM, GM and CSF) are segmented.
7	Language	Literature is not in English
8	Duplication	Literature is a duplicate of other literature in the study.