Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 18;10:1240360. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1240360

Table 4.

Quality assessment checklist adopted from Kitchenham et al. (49) as cited by Usman et al. (50).

NO# Question Score
1 Are the research aim clearly specified? Y|N|P
2 Was the study designed to achieve these aims? Y|N|P
3 Are the segmentation techniques clearly described? Y|N|P
4 Are the evaluation metrics used adequately described Y|N|P
5 Are all research question answered adequately? Y|N|P
6 Are negative (if any) presented? Y|N|P
7 Are datasets considered by the study? Y|N|P
8 Is the purpose of data analysis clear? Y|N|P
9 Do the researcher discuss any problems with validity/reliability of the results Y|N|P
10 How clear are the links between data interpretation and conclusion? Y|N|P
11 Are finding based on multiple projects Y|N|P
12 Are statistical techniques are used to analyse data adequately? Y|N|P
13 Are data collection method adequately described? Y|N|P