Table 5.
Summary of the 19 selected studies using PRISMA approach for isointense brain tissue segmentation.
| Authors | Techniques | Modality | Infantile | Development stage at scan | Early-Adult |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isointense | |||||
| (15) | - | T1, T2 | ✓ | ||
| (20) | K- Nearest Neighbour | T1, T2 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| (5) | Multi-Atlas | T1, T2, FA | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| (18) | Random Forest | T1, T2, FA | ✓ | ||
| (27) | 2D CNN | T1, T2, FA | ✓ | ||
| (25) | SVM | T1, T2 | ✓ | ||
| (51) | Random Forest | T1, T2 | ✓ | ||
| (2) | 3D CNN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ||
| (21) | 3D CNN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ||
| (24) | 3D CNN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| (34) | 3D CNN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ||
| (6) | FCN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ||
| (52) | 3D CNN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ||
| (42) | 3D CNN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ||
| (53) | CNN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| (54) | 2D CNN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ||
| (28) | 3D FCN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| (55) | 3D CNN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ✓ | |
| (56) | GAN | T1, T2 | ✓ | ✓ |