Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 23;5(12):859–869. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.08.006

Table 4.

Regression analysis of potential prognostic factors of heart failure with improved ejection fraction

Factor Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI)
Younger age < 0.001 1.042 (1.018–1.066) < 0.001 1.849 (1.786–1.914)
Female sex 0.012 2.219 (1.386–3.552) 0.088 3.859 (0.818–18.205)
Nonischemic etiology 0.045 2.974 (1.022–8.653) 0.481 1.727 (0.378–7.891)
Higher TAPSE 0.008 2.816 (1.298–6.109) < 0.001 3.071 (1.742–5.413)
Lower LAVi < 0.001 2.212 (1.409–3.472) 0.006 2.034 (1.218–3.396)
Higher IVC 0.231 3.113 (0.487–19.898) NI
Smoking 0.581 1.259 (0.555–2.856) NI
Hypertension 0.106 2.567 (0.817–8.065) NI
Heart rate 0.756 1.235 (0.326–4.678) NI
P2Y12 inhibitor 0.217 3.494 (0.478–25.539) NI
Nitrate 0.268 0.123 (0.003–5.043) NI
Revascularization 0.093 0.525 (0.247–1.115) NI
LA diameter 0.121 2.816 (0.761–10.421) NI
FS 0.495 1.252 (0.656–2.389) NI
IVSd 0.208 1.568 (0.778–3.161) NI
LVIDd 0.071 2.521 (0.881–7.213) NI

CI, confidence interval; d, end diastole; FS, fractional shortening; IVC, inferior vena cava; IVS, interventricular septal; LA, left atrial; LVID,left ventricular internal diameter; LAVi, left atrial volume index; NI, not included; OR, odds ratio; P2Y12, purinergic receptor P2Y G protein-coupled 12; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.