Table 4.
Quality Assessment of Included Studies
| Trials | Random Allocation | Concealed Allocation | Group Similarity at Baseline | Participant Blinding | Therapist Blinding | Assessor Blinding | <15% Dropouts | Intention to Treat Analysis | Between-Group Differences Reported | Point Estimates and Variability Reported | Total Score | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gehlot et al28 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | Good |
| Kumar et al29 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | Good |
| Ali et al30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | Poor |
| Manu et al33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Poor |
| Boyd et al31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | Poor |
| Doshi et al32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | Poor |