Table 1.
Authors | Age | Sex | Presentation | Size | Location | Origin of the trunk | in of Type of treatment | Occlusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ebara et al. [12] | 62 | F | SAH | Small | Distal | BA | Surgical – Midline suboccipital craniotomy and clipping | Complete |
Baskaya et al. [7] | 44 | F | SAH | Small | Distal | BA | Surgical – Midline suboccipital craniotomy and clipping | Complete |
Gopalakrishnan et al. [18] | 68 | F | SAH | Small | Distal | BA | Surgical – Midline suboccipital craniotomy and clipping | Complete |
63 | F | SAH | Small | Distal | BA | Surgical – Retrosigmoidal craniotomy and clipping | Complete | |
Suh et al. [39] | 67 | F | SAH | Small | Proximal | NA | Endovascular – Coiling | Partial |
71 | F | SAH | Small | Proximal | NA | Endovascular – Coiling | Complete | |
66 | F | Incidental finding | Small | Proximal | NA | Endovascular – Stent assisted coiling | Complete | |
72 | F | Incidental finding | Small | Proximal | NA | Endovascular – Stent assisted coiling | Partial | |
46 | F | SAH | Large | Proximal | NA | Endovascular – Stent assisted coiling | Complete | |
Ooigawa et al. [32] | 42 | M | Mass effect leading to cranial nerve deficit | Giant | Distal | BA | Endovascular – Coiling + Surgical – Thrombectomy | Complete |
Ansari et al. [2] | 26 | F | Mass effect leading to cranial nerve deficit | Large | Proximal | VA | Surgical – Retrosigmoidal craniotomy and clipping | Complete |
Current case report | 39 | M | Cranial nerve deficit | Small | Proximal | BA | Endovascular – Flow diversion with PED with Shield Technology | Partial |
BA, basilar artery; VA, vertebral artery