Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 4;44(1):1–15. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20230904.003

Table 2.

GRADE evidence profile of EA vs control cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

Outcome No. of studies No. of patients Quality assessment Relative effect (95% CI) Quality
Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations
Incidence of cardiac automatic rebeat 7 306 Seriousa None None None None RR 1.15 (1.01, 1.31) Moderate
Oxidative stress indicators (SOD) 2 90 Seriousa Seriousb None None None SMD 0.96 (0.32, 1.61) Low
Oxidative stress indicators (MDA) 3 130 Seriousa None None None None SMD -1.62 (-2.15, -1.09) Moderate
Inflammatory factor indicators (IL-2) 2 50 Seriousa Seriousb None Seriousc None SMD 1.33 (0.19, 2.47) Very low
Inflammatory factor indicators (IL-6) 4 250 None Seriousb None None None SMD -0.69 (-1.43, 0.05) Moderate
Inflammatory factor indicators (IL-10) 4 180 Seriousa Seriousb None Seriousc None SMD 0.65 (-0.01, 1.32) Very low
Inflammatory factor indicators (TNF-α) 4 260 None Seriousb None None None SMD -1.28 (-2.37, -0.19) Moderate
Myocardial injury markers (cTnI) 5 243 Seriousa Seriousb None None None SMD -1.09 (-1.85, -0.32) Low
Inotrope scores 2 100 None None None None None SMD -0.77 (-1.22, -0.31) High
Sedative drug usage 12 586 Seriousa None None None None SMD -0.31 (-0.54, -0.09) Moderate
Sedative drug usage (propofol) 5 238 Seriousa Seriousb None None None SMD -0.28 (-0.78, 0.23) Low
Sedative drug usage (midazolam) 6 308 Seriousa None None None None SMD -0.33 (-0.57, -0.09) Moderate
Sedative drug usage (etomidate) 1 40 Seriousa None None Seriousc None SMD -0.36 (-0.99, 0.27) Low
Analgesic usage 8 448 Seriousa Seriousb None None None SMD -0.96 (-1.53, -0.38) Low
Analgesic usage (fentanyl) 4 228 Seriousa Seriousb None None None SMD -0.78 (-1.72, 0.15) Low
Analgesic usage (sufentanil) 3 180 Seriousa None None None None SMD -0.98 (-1.29, -0.67) Moderate
Analgesic usage (remifentanil) 1 40 Seriousa None None Seriousc None SMD -1.91 (-2.67, -1.15) Low
Tracheal intubation time 6 333 Seriousa Seriousb None None None SMD -0.92 (-1.40, -0.45) Low
Time to get out of bed for the first time 2 240 Seriousa Seriousb None Seriousc None SMD -6.58 (-18.70, 5.53) Very low
Total days of antibiotic use 2 230 Seriousa Seriousb None Seriousc None SMD -3.13 (-6.89, 0.63) Very low
Length of ICU stay 9 623 Seriousa Seriousb None None None SMD -1.71 (-3.06, -0.36) Low
Length of hospital stay 8 635 Seriousa Seriousb None Seriousc None SMD -0.71 (-1.56, 0.14) Very low

Notes: EA: electroacupuncture; GRADE: Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; SMD: standardized mean difference; RR: relative risk; CI: confidence interval. GRADE Working Group grades of evidence: high quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect; moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. aQuality was rated down for risk of bias due to inadequately generated randomization sequence, inadequate concealment and blinding, or selectively report of outcomes; bModerate or severe heterogeneity (> 50% heterogeneity); cThe total sample size is insufficient or the outcome is not robust.