Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hosp Pract (1995). 2023 Aug 1;51(4):211–218. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2023.2241342

Table 2:

Characteristics of respondents and self-reported global well-being in the September 2022 survey

Global well-being–mental health Global well-being–social activities and relationships
Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)a
Age <40 years vs. ≥40 years 0.65 (0.30−1.44) 0.73 (0.34−1.55)
Women/Other vs. men 1.23 (0.53−2.90) 1.29 (0.58−2.90)
APPsb vs. physicians 0.31 (0.13−0.76)* 0.56 (0.23−1.32)
Concerned about contracting COVID-19 at work
 Strongly agree or agree vs. otherc 0.80 (0.34−1.86) 0.81 (0.37−1.79)
Survey site
 A vs. D 0.75 (0.26−2.22) 0.99 (0.37−2.68)
 B vs. D 0.38 (0.12−1.17) 0.79 (0.27−2.30)
 C vs. D 0.56 (0.21−1.51) 0.63 (0.24−1.63)

Separate logistic regression models for global well-being–mental health and global well-being–social activities and relationships, adjusted for other listed covariates. Survey sites (Rochester, Mayo Clinic Health System, Arizona, and Florida) were randomly labeled A–D.

a

Odds ratio for top (excellent or very good) vs. lower (good, fair, or poor) category.

b

APPs (advanced practice providers) refer to nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

c

Other included neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree.

*

p<0.05

Data missing: survey site (n=1).

Survey questions listed in Supplement 1.

Abbreviation: COVID-19, Coronavirus disease 2019.