Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 6;78(10):2591–2596. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad278

Table 3.

SVR (ITT) according to ART (N = 132)

ART, n (%) N SVR
ABC/3TC/DTG 48 45/48 (93.8)
TDF/FTC/RPV 22 21/22 (95.5)
TAF/FTC/EVG-c 13 12/13 (92.3)
ABC/3TC + RPV 9 9/9 (100)
TDF/FTC + DTG 8 8/8 (100)
TDF/FTC/EVG-c 7 7/7 (100)
ABC/3TC + RAL 5 5/5 (100)
TDF/FTC + RAL 4 4/4 (100)
DTG/3TC 4 3/4 (75)
TAF/FTC/BIC 1 1/1 (100)
TAF/FTC/DRV-c 1 1/1 (100)
TAF/FTC + DTG 1 1/1 (100)
TAF/FTC/RPV 1 1/1 (100)
ABC/3TC + NVP 1 1/1 (100)
ABC/3TC + DRV-c 1 1/1 (100)
TDF/FTC/EFV 1 1/1 (100)
DTG/RPV 1 1/1 (100)
DRV-c + MVC 1 1/1 (100)
DRV-c 1 1/1 (100)
No ART 2 2/2 (%)

There was no statistical difference among ART (P = 0.156). One patient on other combinations showed discontinuation due to adverse events (cirrhotic patient with Child–Pugh score B7 who developed hepatic encephalopathy). ABC, abacavir; 3TC, lamivudine; DTG, dolutegravir; FTC, emtricitabine; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; EVG-c, elvitegravir-cobicistat; FTC, emtricitabine; RPV, rilpivirine; RAL, raltegravir; BIC, bictegravir; DRV-c, darunavir-cobicistat; EFV, efavirenz; MVC, maraviroc; NVP: nevirapine.