Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2023 Dec 20:2023.12.19.23298260. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.12.19.23298260

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

A: Plot of LIGCL-IPL pre- to post-training of participants who trained in their IF (paired t-test, CI95 =0.003 to 0.025, t22 = 2.837, p = 0.0096). B: Plot of LIGCL-IPL pre- to post-training of participants who trained in their BF (paired t-test, CI95 = −0.0008 to 0.0199, t19 = 1.916, p = 0.07). C: Comparisons of unaffected and affected hemiretina GCL-IPL thicknesses, before and after training in the IF (unaffected pre- vs post-training: paired t-test, CI95= −1.017 to 0.4516, p = 0.4332; affected pre- vs post-training: paired t-test, CI95 = −3.233 to −1.093, p = 0.0004). D: Comparison of unaffected and affected hemiretina GCL-IPL thicknesses, before and after BF training (unaffected pre- vs post-training: paired t-test, CI95 = −0.8943 to 0.4443, p = 0.4902; affected pre- vs post-training: paired t-test, CI95 = −2.691 to −0.0843, p = 0.04). E: Comparison of change in GCL-IPL thickness from pre- to post-training in IF or BF-trained participants (unaffected vs affected hemiretina in IF-trained subjects, paired t-test, CI95=0.2063 to 3.555, p=0.009; unaffected vs affected hemiretina in BF-trained subjects, CI95=−2.601 to 0.2762, p=0.1071; unaffected vs unaffected of both training groups, unpaired t-test, CI95=−0.9176 to 1.033, p=0.9056; affected vs affected of both training groups, unpaired t-test, CI95=−0.8438 to 2.395, p=0.3391). A: Affected, UA: Unaffected, ns: not statistically significant.