Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 8;24:29. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02866-3

Table 2.

Comparison of physical activity and energy consumption levels between cases and controls

Group Cases Controls Total p-value
Weekly physical activity Low (Walking) 15 (30.6%) 3 (4.5%) 18 (15.7%)  < 0.001*
Moderate 15 (30.6%) 37 (56.1%) 52 (45.2%)
High 19 (38.8%) 26 (39.4%) 45 (39.1%)

Low energy consumption level (MET)

780.8 ± 710.2 METS-min/week

Less than 1500 METS 47 (95.9%) 56 (84.8%) 103 (89.9%) 0.03*
1501–3000 METS 2 (4.1%) 9 (13.6%) 11 (9.6%)
Greater than 3000 METS 0 (0%) 1 (1.5%) 1 (0.9%)

Moderate energy consumption level (MET)

2052.2 ± 2014 METS-min/week

Less than 1500 METS 35 (30.4%) 36 (54.5%) 71 (61.7%) 0.25
1501–3000 METS 5 (10.2%) 12 (18.2%) 17 (14.8%)
Greater than 3000 METS 9 (18.4%) 18 (24.8%) 27 (23.5%)

Vigorous energy consumption level (METS)

3840 ± 382.4 METS-min/week

Less than 1500 METS 41 (83.7%) 61 (92.4%) 102 (88.7%) 0.40
1501–3000 METS 7 (14.3%) 5 (7.6%) 12 (10.4%)
Greater than 3000 METS 1 (2.0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.9%)

*Significance level: p-value ≤ 0.05