Table 5. Changes in measures of physical activity among participants unaffected by the COVID-19 pandemic*#.
| Sedentary Hours Per Week | Month 6§ | Month 12§§ |
| Control (Text4Baby) | -19.0 (-30.5 to -7.5) (p = 0.001) | -16.5 (-28.0 to -5.0) (p = 0.005) |
| Intervention (Fit After Baby) | -19.4 (-28.2 to -10.7) (p < 0.0001) | -19.6 (-28.3 to -10.8) (p < 0.0001) |
| Mean difference between groups | -0.04 (p = 0.96) | -3.1 (p = 0.67) |
| Moderate Activity Hours Per Week | Month 6§ | Month 12§§ |
| Control (Text4Baby) | -18.3 (-32.7 to -4.0) (p = 0.01) | -12.8 (-27.1 to 1.5) (p = 0.08) |
| Intervention (Fit After Baby) | -16.6 (-27.5 to -5.7) (p = 0.003) | -18.8 (-29.7 to -5.7) (p = 0.001) |
| Mean difference between groups | 1.70 (p = 0.85) | -6.0 (p = 0.51) |
| Light Activity Hours Per Week | Month 6§ | Month 12§§ |
| Control (Text4Baby) | -19.0 (-31.4 to -6.5) (p = 0.003) | -22.3 (-34.8 to -9.8) (p = 0.0006) |
| Intervention (Fit After Baby) | -22.5 (-32.0 to 13.0) (p < 0.0001) | -26.6 (-36.0 to -17.1) (p < 0.0001) |
| Mean difference between groups | -3.57 (p = 0.65) | -4.25 (p = 0.59) |
#All models adjusted for baseline values
*Not enough data for vigorous activity for participants unaffected by COVID
†There were data from 45 participants at the 6-month time point, but for the purposes of analysis, the model predicted data for all 81 women
††There were data from 40 participants at the 12-month time point, but for the purposes of analysis, the model predicted data for all 81 women
§There were data from 34 participants at the 6-month time point, but for the purposes of analysis, the model predicted data for all 60 women unaffected by COVID
§§There were data from 36 participants at the 12-month time point, but for the purposes of analysis, the model predicted data for all 60 women unaffected by COVID