Skip to main content
. 2015 May 12;2015(5):CD010180. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010180.pub2

Comparison 2. Cyanoacrylate versus alcohol‐based compounds.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Bleeding‐related mortality 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.09, 2.04]
1.1 Randomised trial 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.09, 2.04]
2 Failure of intervention 1 17 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.36 [0.09, 1.35]
2.1 Randomised trial 1 17 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.36 [0.09, 1.35]
3 Re‐bleeding 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.30, 2.45]
3.1 Randomised trial 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.30, 2.45]
4 Adverse effects (fever) 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.22, 0.80]
4.1 Randomised trial 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.22, 0.80]
5 Adverse effects (ulceration) 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.79 [0.53, 1.17]
6 Control of bleeding 1 37 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.79 [1.13, 2.84]