Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 29;21(1):83–91. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-02092-7

Fig. 1. FDR and power comparisons for continuous and binary exposures.

Fig. 1

a,b, The FDR and power of various DA methods for continuous (a) and binary exposures (b) are summarized. Synthetic datasets were generated using the PLN model18 based on the mean vector and covariance matrix estimated from the URT dataset19. The x axis represents the sample size (or sample size per group for the binary exposure), and the y axis shows the FDR or power. The dashed lines denote the nominal level of FDR (FDR = 0.05). The proportion of true DA taxa are provided in the top of each panel. The mean estimated FDR (or power) ± standard errors (indicated by error bars) derived from 100 simulation runs are provided in each panel.