Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 19;32(1):101933. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101933

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Evaluation of the neurological deficit score. Results are presented as M ± SEM (n = 12). a Significantly different in comparison with sham group (p ≤ 0.05). b Significantly different in comparison with IR control group (p ≤ 0.05). IR: ischemia/reperfusion; CUP: cupressuflavone.