Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 26;2015(6):CD003036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003036.pub3

Comparison 2. Immediate postplacental insertion versus standard insertion.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Placement (insertion) per protocol 4 243 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.07 [0.54, 30.40]
2 Expulsion by 6 months 4 210 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 4.89 [1.47, 16.32]
3 Use at 6 months 4 243 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.04 [1.01, 4.09]
4 Use at 3 months 1 31 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.04, 5.35]
5 Use at 12 months 1 42 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.17 [0.63, 7.44]
6 Placement (insertion) 1 156 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.04 [0.87, 4.76]
7 Continued use at 12 months     Other data No numeric data