Table 2.
Effect direction plot.a,b
Study | Study design | Days unvaccinatedc | Uptake of vaccinesd | Vaccine acceptanced |
Daley et al [63] | Randomized controlled trial | N/Ae | N/A | ▲f |
Glanz et al [64] | Randomized controlled trial | ▲ | N/A | N/A |
O’Leary et al [65] | Randomized controlled trial | N/A | ▲ | N/A |
Liao et al [69] | Randomized controlled trial | N/A | ◄►g | N/A |
Zhang et al [70] | Online survey experiment | N/A | N/A | ▲ |
Ugarte et al [68] | Randomized controlled trial | N/A | N/A | ▲ |
Abdel-Qader et al [71] | Randomized controlled trial | N/A | ▲ | N/A |
Brandt et al [72] | Controlled quasi-experimental mixed methods | N/A | N/A | ▲ |
Lau et al [67] | Randomized controlled trial | N/A | ▲ | N/A |
aStudy design: assessed as a randomized controlled trial.
bItalicized entries indicate a low risk of bias; nonitalicized entries indicate some concerns.
cNumber of trials or experiments must be ≥2, and so, it was not possible to calculate the P value for the outcome “Days unvaccinated.”
dSign test for positive effect direction (1-tailed): P=.13 for both uptake of vaccines and vaccine acceptance.
eN/A: not applicable.
fPositive health impact.
gNo change/mixed effects/conflicting findings.