Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 24;120(47):797–803. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0208

eTable 3. Criteria-based summary of the clinical evidence supporting digital health applications (DiGA).

DiGA Publication (first author) Type Inclusion criteria n (intervention/ control) Intervention Control Primary endpoint Blinding % female % retention Effect size of the primary endpoin Comment
Deprexis Twomey (2020) (1)*1 MA RCTs on Deprexis 2 901; 12 RCTs 8–12 w G or U WL Various NA 72.1 g = 0.51 [0.40; 0.62] Expansion by Twomey (2017) (2) by 4 RCTs
Twomey (2017) (11)*1 MA RCTs on Deprexis 2 402; 8 RCTs 8–12 w G or U WL Various NA 73.5 g = 0.54 [0.39; 0.69]
Meyer (2009) (12)*1*2*3 RCT General population 396 (320/76) 9 w U; 6 mo FU WL BDI-I 76 55 d = 0.30 [0.05; 0.55]*5
Berger (2011) (13)*1*2*3 RCT BDI-II > 13 76 (25/25/26) 10 w G/U, 6 mo FU WL BDI-II 69.7 90.1 U: d = 0.66 (-/-)G: d = 1.14 (-/-)
Moritz (2012) (14)*2*3 RCT Depressive disorder 210 (105/105) 8 w U WL BDI-I 78.6 78.1 d = 0.36 (-/-)
Schröder (2014) (15)*2*3 RCT Epilepsy + depressive symptoms 78 (38/40) 9 w U WL BDI-I Yes 75.6 63 d = 0.29 (-/-) Diagnosis Epilepsy
Meyer (2015) (16)*1*2*3 RCT Moderate or severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 > 14) 163 (78/85) 12 w U; 6 mo FU WL PHQ-9 74.8 78 d = 0.57 [0.22; 0.92)
6 mo: d = 0.3 [−0.03; 0.69]
Fischer (2015) (17)*2*3 RCT Multiple sclerosis+ depressive symptoms 90 (45/45) 9 w U; 6 mo FU WL BDI-II Yes 78 78 d = 0.53(-/-) Diagnosis Multiple sclerosis
Klein (2016) (18)*2*3 RCT Mild to moderate depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 = 5–14) 1 013 (509/504) 12 w U (G if PHQ-9 >10); 6 mo FU WL PHQ-9 Yes 78.4 d = 0.39 [0.13; 0.64]
6 mo: d = 0.32 [0.06; 0.69]
Limited information available on population
Beevers (2017) (19)*1*2*3 RCT Moderate depressive symptoms (QIDS-SR ≥ 10) 376 (285/91) 8 w U WL QIDS-SR 74.4 79.6 d = 0.8 [0.65; 1.04]
Zwerenz (2017) (20)*3 RCT Depressive disorder + BDI-II > 13 229 (115/114) 12 w U + SB SB BDI-II No 60.7 88 d = 0.44 (-/-) Population: inpatients
Berger (2018) (21)*1*2*3 RCT Unipolar depression 98 (51/47) 12 w U + PT 6 mo FU PT BDI-II Yes 66.3 70.4 d = 0.51 [0.11; 0.91]
Bücker (2018) (22)*3 RCT Problem gambling + subjective sadness/despair 140 (71/69) 8 w U WL PHQ-9 No 24 44.3 PP: d = 0.34 (-/-);
ηp2 = 0.125; p = 0.03
Population: slot machine gamblers; no ITT analysis
Fuhr (2018) (23)*1*2 RCT Subjective depressive symptoms 27(14/13) 10 w U WL PHQ-9 No 68 I d = 0.22 (-/-)*5
K d = 0.37 (-/-)*5
Richter (2022) (24) RCT IP with depression 69 (36/33) 12 w G + SB SB BDI-II n 46.9 62.5 d = −0.73 [1.4; 0.06] Population: inpatients
Zwerenz (2019) (25) RCT Diagnosed depressive disorder + BDI-II > 13 229 (115/114) 12 w U + IP; 6 mo FU IP BDI-II 60.7 87.8 d = 0.58 (-/-) Population: inpatients
Klein (2017) (26)*1 RCT Mild to moderate depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 = 5–14) 1 013 (509/504) 12 w U (G if PHQ-9 > 10); 12 mo FU WL PHQ-9 Yes 86.7 77.6 d = 0.13 [−0.18; 0.45] Follow-up/Klein (2016) (9)
Schuster (2020) (27)*1 RCT Mild to moderate depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 = 5–14) 340 (166/174) 12 w U (G if PHQ-9 > 10) + PT; 6 mo FU PT PHQ-9 Yes 71.1 88.8 d = –0.32 [−0.11; 0.53]
6 mo: d = –0.31 [−0.09; 0.52]
Follow-up/subgroup analysis from Klein (2016) (9)
Mullarkey (2020) (28) RCT At least moderate depressive symptoms (QIDS-SR ≥ 10) 295 (219/76) 8 w U WL QIDS-SR 75.2 100 CC: sadness d = 0.81 [0.54; 1.08]; indecision d = 0.72 [0.45; 0.99]; etc Symptom level analysis Beevers (2017) (10); no ITT analysis
Klein (2020) (29)*1 SAT Depression or dysthymia 104 12 w U or G + OP NA MADRS, PHQ-9 NA 60.6 79.8 MADRS d = 1.42 [0.08; 2.76]*5 PHQ-9 d = 1.29 [0.60; 1.97]*5
Gräfe (2020) (6) RCT At least mild depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 > 4) 3 805 (1 904/ 1 901) 12 w U 3 mo and 9 mo FU WL PHQ-9 79 72.6 d = 0.37 [0.29; 0.44]
3 mo: d = 0.23 [0.15; 0.31]
9 mo: d = 0.5 [0.07; 0.23]
Also evidence of reduced healthcare costs
Selfapy’s Online course Depr. Krämer (2022) (30)*1 RCT Mild to severe depression 401 (151/150/ 100) 12 w G/U 6 mo FU WL BDI-II Yes 83 75.1 G: d = 1.63 [1.37; 1.93];
U: d = 1.47 [1.22; 1.73]; 6 mo
G: d = 1.58 [1.29; 1.95]*5;
6 mo U: d = 1.88 [1.59; 2.24]*5
Effect sizes in DiGA Directory differ from publication*7
Novego: coping with depression Beiwinkel (2017) (31) RCT Mild to moderate depression, dysthymia 180 (100/80) 12 w G 6 mo FU WL PHQ-9, BDI-II No 68.3 48.8 PHQ-9: d = 0.55 [0.25; 0.85]
BDI-II: d = 0.41 [0.11; 0.70]
Moritz (2016) (2) RCT Schizophrenia + subjective depressive symptoms 58 (31/27) 12 w U WL CES-D Yes 55.4 84 p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.179
CC: p = 0.003,. ηp2 = 0.176
Diagnosis Schizophrenia
Miegel (2019) (32) RCT Subjective depressive and pain symptoms 142 (71/71) 12 w U WL BDI-II No 77.5 67.7 p = 0.014, ηp2 = 0.043 Diagnosis pain; study only in German language
elona therapy Depression Unpublished (e23) RCT Unipolar depression 80(-/-) 12 w + PT PT PHQ-9, BDI-II, GAD-7 77.5 PHQ-9: d = 0.27(-/-);
BDI-II: d = 0.22(-/-);
GAD-7: d = 0.50(-/-)
No information on population
Edupression.com*6 Unpublished (e24) RCT Mild to moderate depressive symptoms 62(-/-) 12 w WL PHQ-9 67.2 MD = –1.74 [−3.74; 0.26]; p = 0.09;
PP: DOM = –3.67 [−6.35; 1.00]; p = 0.008
No information on population
Invirto - The Therapy for Anxiety Unpublished (e25) RCT Agoraphobia +/- panic disorder, panic disorder, social phobia 297 (197/100) 6 mo WL BAI 62 82 Agoraphobia: DOM = 6.64 [2.33; 10.95]; p = 0.0029;
Panic: DOM = 6.55 [1.38; 11.71]; p = 0.0137;
Social phobia: DOM = 3.42 [0.01; 6.85]; p = 0.0499
Mindable: Panic disorder, Agoraphobia *6 Unpublished (e26) RCT Panic disorder/ agoraphobia 107 (57/50) 8 w WL PAS 84.1 d = 0.64 (-/-)
Selfapy’s online course for gen. anxiety disorder Unpublished (e27) RCT Generalized anxiety disorder 156 (78/78) 12 w WL GAD-7, WHO-5 82 76.9 GAD-7: d = –0.85 [−1.19; 0.51]
WHO-5 d = 0.60 [0.29; 0.91]
No information about statistical analysis
Velibra *6 Berger (2017) (33)*1 RCT Social anxiety disorder, panic disorder +/- agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder 139 (70/69) 9 w U 6 mo FU WL DASS-21, BAI, BDI-II, SF-12 MH No 70.5 81 DASS-21: d = 0.47 [0.13; 0.81]
BAI d = 0.41 [0.07; 0.74]
BDI-II d = 0.61 [0.27; 0.95]
SF-12 MH d = 0.49 [0.15; 0.83]
HelloBetter Panic Ebenfeld (2021) (34) RCT Mild to moderate symptoms of anxiety (PAS 9–28) 92 (45/47) 8 w G 3 mo + 6 mo FU WL PAS Yes 55.4 91 d = 0.66 [0.24; 1.08]
3 mo: d = 0.89 [0.46; 1.31]
6 mo: d = 0.81 [0.38; 1.24]
Exclusion of PTSD, dissociative disorders; effect size in DiGA D < in publication
Nichtraucher Helden app Unpublished (e28) SAT Nicotine dependence 50 4 mo NA Nicotine abstinence NA Smoking abstinence (7-day prevalence) in 30% (n = 15)*5 No information about statistical analysis and population
Vorvida*6 Zill (2019) (35)*1 RCT Harmful use of alcohol (> 12/24 g/d in m/f or AUDIT-C > 3) 608 (306/302) 6 mo U WL QFI (intake in last 30 days), TFB (intake in last 7 days No 52.5 68 3 mo QFI: d = 0.38 (-/-)
3 mo TFB: d = 0.42 (-/-)
6 mo QFI: d = 0.33 (-/-)
6 mo TFB: d = 0.54 (-/-)
Somnio Lorenz (2019) (36)*1 RCT ISI > 8 56 (29/27) 6 w U; 12 mo FU WL ISI Yes 67.2 86.2 d = 1.79(-/-)
12 mo: d = 1.98 [1.31; 2.66]
Exclusion of shift work, OSAS, RLS, parasomnia
HelloBetter Sleep Unpublished (e29) IPD-MA NA 433 (216/217) 8 w WL ISI NA d = 1.06 [0.85; 1.26] Inhomogeneous study population
Thiart (2015) (37)*1*4 RCT ISI ≥ 15 128 (64/64) 6 w G; 6 mo FU WL ISI No 74.2 92.2 d = 1.45 [1.06; 1.84]
6 mo: d = 1.43 [1.04; 1.82]
Population: teachers
Eber (2015) (38)*1*4 RCT ISI ≥ 15 128 (64/64) 6 w U; 6mo FU WL ISI No 74.2 59.4 d = 1.37 [0.99; 1.77]
6 mo: no control available
Population:teachers
Behrendt (2020) (39)*1*4 RCT Interest in iCBT-I 177 (88/89) 6 w U; 6 mo FU WL ISI No 65.5 40 d = 0.97 [0.66; 1.28]
6 mo: d = 0.86 [0.55; 1.17]
HelloBetter Stress/Burnout Heber (2016) (40)*1 RCT PSS-10 ≥ 22, healthy employees 264 (132/132) 7 w G; 6 mo FU WL PSS-10 No 73.1 69.7 d = 0.83 [0.58; 1.08]
6 mo: d = 1.02 [0.76; 1.27]
HelloBetter Vaginismus Plus Zarski (2017) (3)*1 RCT Vaginismus + no vaginal intercourse since >6 mo 77(40/37) 10 w G; 6 mo FU WL PEQ item 7 No 100 90 CC: d = 0.16 [−0.32; 0.64]
6 mo: d = 0.37 [−0.17; 0.92]
No ITT analysis
Zarski (2021) (4)*1 RCT Nonorganic vaginismus/dyspareunia (PEQ item 7 ≥ 1) 200 (100/100) 12 w G; 6 mo FU WL PEQ item 7 No 100 79 Ability of coital vaginal penetration:
12 w: χ2(1) = 9.44; p < 0.01;
6 mo: χ2(1) = 2.19; p = 0.19
Effect size in DiGA D >in publication
HelloBetter ratiopharm Chronic Pain Lin (2017) (5)*1 RCT Pain >3 mo + one of the diagnoses: M79.7, M54, F45.40, F45.41, R52.1, R52.2 302 (100/101/ 101) 9 w G/U; 6 mo FU WL WHYMPI, (pain interference subscale) 84.1 76 G: d = 0.58 [0.30; 0.86]
6 mo guided d = 0.58 [0.30; 0.86]
U: no significant effect
Effect sizes of the unguided intervention not shown
Unpublished (e30) RCT Pain >3 mo + one of the diagnoses: M79.7, M54, F45.40, F45.41, R52.1, R52.2 201 (100/101) 9 w G WL WHYMPI, (pain interference subscale) β = −0.756; p<0.001;
θ = −0.66
No information about statistical analysis and population

*1 Trial carried out with participation of the manufacturer. *2 Study was included in Twomey (2017). *3 Study was included in Twomey(2020). *4 Study was included in an IPD-MA. *5 Gray font color: highlights pre-post analysis-based statistics. *6 Studies also show improvements in structure and processes (not shown here). *7 According to the manufacturer, various ITT processes were used. –, not stated.% female, proportion of women in the sample (%);% Retention, retention of subjects at the end of intervention; OP, outpatient psychiatric/psychotherapeutic/medical treatment; AUDIT-C, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; short version; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; BDI-I, Beck‘s Depression Inventory, version 1; BDI-I, Beck’s Depression Inventory, version 2; CC, complete case analysis; CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; d, Cohen’s d (measure of effect size); DASS-21, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (21 items); FU, Follow-up; G, guided (personal assistance from trained staff); g, Hedges’ g (measure of effect size); GAD-7, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (7 items); ICBT-I, Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia; IPD-MA, individual patient data meta-analysis; ISI, Insomnia Severity Index; ITT, intention-to-treat analysis; C, control; MA, meta-analysis; mo, months; DOM, baseline-adjusted difference of means; NA, not applicable; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; p, p-value (significance level); PAS, Parkinson Anxiety Scale; PEQ, Primary Endpoint Questionnaire; PHQ-9, 9-question Patient Health Questionnaire; PP, per-protocol analysis; PSS-10; Perceived Stress Scale (10 items); PT, psychotherapy; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder; QFI, Quantity Frequency Index; QIDS-SR, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology – Self-Report; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RLS, Restless Legs Syndrome; SAT, single-arm trial; IP, in-patient psychiatric/psychosomatic treatment; SF-12 MH, Short Form 12 Health Survey – Mental Health (12 items); SvMADRS, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, short version; TFB, Timeline-followback method; U, unguided (independent use); w, weeks; WHO-5, World Health Organisation Five Well-Being Index; WHYMPI, West Haven Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory; WL, waiting list; ηp2, partial eta-squared; χ2, chi-square test. If available, 95% confidence intervals were shown in square brackets after the effect size measure. Example: d = 0.23 [0.15; 0.31]. Missing 95% confidence intervals are shown as (-/-).