Skip to main content
letter
. 2024 Jan 4;20:12–16. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.20.2

Table 1.

Optimization of reaction conditions.a

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-20-12-i001.jpg

Catalyst (mol %) Ligand (mol %) Base (equiv) Equiv of 1a Yield (%)

1 CuI DMEDA (20) K3PO4 (1.5) 1.0 22b
2 CuI (10) + 1 equiv AgNO3 DMEDA (20) K3PO4 (1.5) 1.0 n.d.
3 CuI (10) DMEDA (20) K2CO3 (1.5) 1.0 16b,c
4 Cu(OTf)2 (10) glyme (20) K2CO3 (2.5) 1.0 33b
5 Cu(OTf)2 (10) diglyme (20) K2CO3 (2.5) 1.5 42b
6 Cu(OTf)2 (15) diglyme (30) K2CO3 (2.5) 2.0 44b
7 CuI (15) diglyme (30) K 2 CO 3 (3.0) 2.0 76 b
74 d
8 CuI (15) diglyme (30) Cs2CO3 (3.0) 2.0
9 CuCl diglyme (30) K2CO3 (3.0) 2.0
10 CuBr diglyme (30) K2CO3 (3.0) 2.0
11 CuI (15) diglyme (30) K2CO3 (3.0) 2.0 e
12 CuI (15) diglyme (30) K2CO3 (3.0) f

aCommon reaction conditions: 18 h at 120 °C, in degassed p-xylene under Ar atmosphere. bYields determined via GC–MS at a 100 µmol scale. cReaction carried out in DMF. dIsolated yields on a 200 µmol scale. e2.0 equiv of KI added. f2,2-Diiodobiphenyl as starting material.