Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 10;19:10. doi: 10.1186/s13000-023-01426-5

Table 1.

NTRK1-3 Testing Methodologies

Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) ▪ Variable sensitivity
▪ High specificity
▪ Fusion detection requires specific primers targeting suspected genes and exons
▪ Hindered by RNA degradation
RNA based NGS alone ▪ Ability to access for unknown fusion partners, including other oncogenic alterations as well as splice variants ▪ Hindered by RNA degradation
DNA-based NGS alone

▪ Access for point mutations, fusions, and copy number changes

▪ Limited sensitivity to detect NTRK3 fusions

▪ Reliant on decent tumor purity
Dual DNA/RNA based NGS ▪ Superior analysis while likely being the most expensive methodology ▪ Reliant on decent tumor purity
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)

▪ Comparable turn-around time (approximately 1–3 days) compared to IHC

▪ Designed to detect specific breakpoints

▪ Best utilized when there is high suspicion of ETV6-NTRK3 fusions
Pan-TRK IHC ▪ Ability to screen for NTRK1-3 fusions while remaining cost effective

▪ Limited specificity

▪ Detects physiologic wild-type TRK expression