Table 1.
Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) | ▪ Variable sensitivity ▪ High specificity |
▪ Fusion detection requires specific primers targeting suspected genes and exons ▪ Hindered by RNA degradation |
---|---|---|
RNA based NGS alone | ▪ Ability to access for unknown fusion partners, including other oncogenic alterations as well as splice variants | ▪ Hindered by RNA degradation |
DNA-based NGS alone |
▪ Access for point mutations, fusions, and copy number changes ▪ Limited sensitivity to detect NTRK3 fusions |
▪ Reliant on decent tumor purity |
Dual DNA/RNA based NGS | ▪ Superior analysis while likely being the most expensive methodology | ▪ Reliant on decent tumor purity |
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) |
▪ Comparable turn-around time (approximately 1–3 days) compared to IHC ▪ Designed to detect specific breakpoints |
▪ Best utilized when there is high suspicion of ETV6-NTRK3 fusions |
Pan-TRK IHC | ▪ Ability to screen for NTRK1-3 fusions while remaining cost effective |
▪ Limited specificity ▪ Detects physiologic wild-type TRK expression |