TABLE 4.
Treatment | N | Cell number (mean ± SD, x104, [%inhibition]) | Cell number (mean ± SD, [% inhibition]) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bronchoalveolar lavage | Nasal lavage | ||||||
Neutrophils | Alveolar macrophage | Lymphocyte | Neutrophils | Alveolar macrophage | Lymphocyte | ||
Experiment 1 | |||||||
Vehicle (1% DMSO saline) + virus | 5 | 7.9 ± 1.2 | 36 ± 7.0 | 7.3 ± 0.94 | 2.2 ± 0.48 | 5.1 ± 0.49 | 1.8 ± 0.14 |
AB (0.5 mg/mL, in) + virus | 5 | 6.8 ± 1.5 [14] |
36 ± 4.7 [0] |
6.1 ± 0.42
b
[16] |
2.0 ± 0.48 [9] |
4.4 ± 0.35 [14] |
2.0 ± 0.30 [−11] |
AB (2 mg/mL, in) + virus | 5 | 4.9 ± 0.76
c
[38] |
26 ± 3.3
b
[28] |
5.4 ± 0.87
c
[26] |
1.2 ± 0.38
c
[45] |
4.0 ± 0.56
c
[22] |
1.3 ± 0.10
c
[28] |
Oseltamivir (10 mg/kg, po) | 5 | 2.0 ± 0.96
d
[75] |
11 ± 4.3
d
[69] |
2.0 ± 0.71
d
[73] |
1.2 ± 0.38
c
[45] |
3.8 ± 0.53
c
[25] |
1.3 ± 0.30
c
[28] |
Experiment 2 | |||||||
Vehicle (water) + virus | 4 | 7.5 ± 1.6 | 38 ± 3.9 | 7.5 ± 1.3 | 2.1 ± 0.57 | 4.7 ± 1.1 | 1.8 ± 0.18 |
AM (2 mg/mL, in) + virus | 4 | 4.7 ± 0.91
b
[37] |
25 ± 4.8
b
[34] |
5.1 ± 1.1
b
[32] |
1.1 ± 0.38
b
[48] |
3.9 ± 0.76 [17] |
1.1 ± 0.18
b
[39] |
Experiment 3 | |||||||
Vehicle (water) + virus | 4 | 8.3 ± 2.5 | 40 ± 3.6 | 8.1 ± 1.6 | 2.2 ± 0.58 | 5.2 ± 1.0 | 1.8 ± 0.32 |
AM (2 mg/mL, in) + virus | 4 | 6.2 ± 0.86
b
[25] |
24 ± 4.8
c
[40] |
5.0 ± 0.66
b
[38] |
1.0 ± 0.23
c
[55] |
3.6 ± 0.38
b
[31] |
0.93 ± 0.21
c
[48] |
AB: Apilimod base, AM: Apilimod mesylate, BAL: bronchoalveolar lavage, NL: nasal lavage, For experiment 1, changes in each group were compared to virus-infected animals treated with vehicle using Dunnett’s one-way analysis of variance.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, , ***P < 0.001, For experiment 2 and 3, changes in each group were compared to respective vehicle control infected animals using un-paired t-test followed by Mann-Whitney test.
P < 0.05.
P < 0.01.
P < 0.001.