Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 19;13(1):3. doi: 10.3390/cells13010003

Table 1.

Discrimination and diagnostic potential of various biomarkers of PDAC. Listed biomarkers were curated according to their sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values. NM (not mentioned).

Biomarker Patients SN (%) SP (%) AUC Reference Year

PROTEIN BIOMARKERS
CA19.9 3285 PDAC vs. 1882 cases with benign pancreatic disease 78.2 82.8 Differs for malignant vs. benign cases (0.878) and PDAC vs. CP (0.885) [30] 2013
CEA 1324 PDAC vs. 301 cases with benign pancreatic disease 44.2 84.8 Differs for malignant vs. benign cases (0.702) and PDAC vs. CP (0.721) [30] 2013
ExoGPC-1 246 PDAC vs. 120 HC 100 100 1.0 [25] 2015
HSP-27 35 PDAC vs. 37 HC 100 84 0.98 [129] 2007
COL6A3 44 PDAC vs. 30 HC 93 97 0.975 [59] 2014
CXCL8 42 PDAC vs. 34 HC 98 95 0.9898 [130] 2018
REG1A and REG1B 41 PDAC vs. 61 HC 92 95 NM [131] 2016
PIM-1 90 PDAC vs. 20 HC 95.6 100 0.984 [132] 2016
MIC-1 2770 PDAC vs. 2082 HC NM NM 0.93 [133] 2023

PROTEIN PANELS
TFPI, TNC, and CA19.9 37 PDAC vs. 15 HC 90 100 0.99 [134] 2011
ICAM-1, OPG, and CA19.9 333 PDAC vs. 227 HC 88 90 0.93 [135] 2011
C5, A1BG, and CA19.9 22 PDAC vs. 29 HC 87 90 0.92 [136] 2013
C4BPA and CA19.9 52 PDAC vs. 40 HC 85 96 0.93 [137] 2016
IGFBP2, IGFBP3, and CA19.9 101 PDAC vs. 38 HC 88 89 0.89 [138] 2016
THBS2 and CA19.9 288 PDAC vs. 230 HC 87 87 0.97 [139] 2017
TIMP1, LRG1, and CA19.9 187 PDAC vs. 169 HC 85 95 0.95 [140] 2017
ALB, CRP, IL-8, and CA19.9 292 PDAC vs. 383 HC 94 90 0.98 [141] 2014
APOA2-ATQ/AT and CA19.9 286 PDAC vs. 217 HC 95.4 98.3 0.96 [142] 2015
APOA2, APOC1, and CA19.9 111 PDAC vs. 105 HC 93 100 0.96 [143] 2010
APOA1, APOE, APOL1, ITIH3, and CA19.9 80 PDAC vs. 40 HC 95 94.1 0.99 [144] 2017
APOA1, APOE, APOL1, and ITIH3 80 PDAC vs. 40 HC 85 94 0.94 [144] 2017
CA242, CA19.9, CEA, and CA125 52 PDAC vs. 40 HC 90 94 NM [145] 2015
POSTN, CA242, and CA19.9 213 PDAC vs. 74 HC 92 97 0.98 [146] 2018
EPHB3, FGF1, ID1, IL2, IL10, IMPDH2, SELL, and VCAM1 72 PDAC vs. 49 HC 89 91 0.95 [147] 2017
10 peptide signatures 88 PDAC vs. 185 HC 92% and 95% 95 0.96 [148] 2015
HPT, C3, C4A, C5, C7, IgG1, and IgA1 122 PDAC vs. 252 HC 92.1 90.6 0.94 [149] 2014
18 proteins targeted by scFv human recombinant antibodies 103 PDAC vs. 30 HC 88 85 0.95 [150] 2012
19 proteins targeted by scFv human recombinant antibodies 156 PDAC vs. 30 HC 99 80 0.98 [151] 2015
29 proteins targeted by scFv human recombinant antibodies 586 PDAC vs. 1107 HC 95 94 0.97 [152] 2018

CIRCULATING TUMOUR DNA
Quantity of cfDNA 24 PDAC vs. 38 HC and 21 IPMN vs. 38 HC 83 and 81 92 and 84 0.92 [153] 2016
DNA methylation of SST 30 PDAC vs. 18 HC 93 89 0.89 [154] 2020
DNA methylation of ADAMTS1 and BNC1 42 PDAC vs. 26 HC 81 85 NM [155] 2013
DNA methylation of ADAMTS1 and BNC1 39 PDAC vs. 95 HC 97 92 0.95 [156] 2019
Mutations in amplicons 100 PDAC vs. 29 HC 82 100 NM [157] 2016

RNA BIOMARKERS
Exo-miRNA-21 30 PDAC vs. 10 CP 80 90 NM [158] 2020
Exo-miRNA-21 22 PDAC vs. 27 non-PDAC NM NM 0.897 [159] 2013
miR-18a 36 PDAC vs. 30 HC 92 94 0.9369 [160] 2011
miR-1290 19 PDAC vs. 10 HC, 19 PDAC vs. 10 CP and 19 PDAC vs. 10 NPET 88 for PDAC vs. HC 84 for PDAC vs. HC 0.96, 0.81 and 0.80 [62] 2013
miR-22-3p 35 PDAC vs. 15 HC 97.14 93.33 0.943 [161] 2017
miR-642b-3p 35 PDAC vs. 15 HC 100 100 1.0 [161] 2017
miR-885-5p 35 PDAC vs. 15 HC 100 100 1.0 [161] 2017
Exo-miR-21 27 PDAC vs. 8 CP 81 88 0.89 [162] 2019
Exo-miR-155 27 PDAC vs. 8 CP 89 88 0.90 [162] 2019
Exo-miR-451 52 PDAC vs. 20 HC NM NM 0.9329 [163] 2021
Exo-miR-720 52 PDAC vs. 20 HC NM NM 1.0 [163] 2021
miR-373 103 PDAC vs. 50 HC 81 84 0.852 [164] 2017
WASF2 27 PDAC vs. 13 HC NM NM 0.943 [83] 2019
ARF6 27 PDAC vs. 13 HC NM NM 0.940 [83] 2019
SNORA74A 27 PDAC vs. 13 HC NM NM 0.909 [83] 2019
SNORA25 27 PDAC vs. 13 HC NM NM 0.903 [83] 2019
HULC 20 PDAC vs. 21 HC and 20 PDAC vs. 22 IPMN 80 and 85 95 and 83 0.94 and 0.91 [165] 2020

MIXED AND RNA PANELS
Exo-miR-10b, 21, 30c, 181a, and let7a 29 PDAC vs. 6 HC and 29 PDAC vs. 11 CP 100 100 1.0 [63] 2017
miR-16, miR-196a, and CA19.9 140 PDAC vs. 68 HC and 140 PDAC vs. 111 CP 92 and 88.4 95.6 and 96.3 0.979 and 0.956 [166] 2012
miR-1290, miR-1246, and CA19.9 120 PDAC vs. 40 HC and 120 PDAC vs. 40 Non-PDAC (CP/IPMN/PNET) 96.7 and 92.5 97.5 and 90 0.99 and 0.96 [167] 2020
miR-125a, miR-4294, miR-4476, miR-4530, miR-6075, miR-6799, miR-6836, and miR-6880 100 PDAC vs. 150 HC 80.3 97.6 0.953 [168] 2015
miR-125a-3p, miR-642b-3p, and miR-5100 424 PDAC vs. 2599 HC 98 97 0.95 [169] 2020
Signature of 10 miRNAs 409 PDAC vs. 312 HC 85 85 0.93 [64] 2014
Signature of 12 miRNAs 417 PDAC vs. 307 HC 85 90 0.95 [170] 2016
LGLRAD3 and CA19.9 31 PDAC vs. 31 HC 80 94 0.87 [171] 2017
ABHD11-AS1 and CA19.9 114 PDAC vs. 46 HC 98 100 0.98 [172] 2019
Exo-CLDN1, FGA, HIST1H2BK, ITIH2, KRT19, MARCH2, MAL2, and TIMP1 189 PDAC vs. 74 HC and 186 PDAC vs. 55 CP 96 and 94 100 and 81 0.98 and 0.92 [173] 2020

CIRCULATING TUMOUR CELLS
CK8, CK18, and CA19.9 41 PDAC vs. 20 HC 80 100 NM [174] 2011
CD45, CK8, CK18, and CK19 15 PDAC vs. 15 HC 80 100 NM [175] 2015
Expression of C-MET, hTERT, CK20, and CEA 25 PDAC vs. 15 HC 100 100 NM [176] 2011
Vimentin+, CD45, Hoechst+, and CA19.9 100 PDAC vs. 30 HC 91 97 0.97 [177] 2019