Table 4.
Thermodynamic characteristics of gelatinization of barley starch pastes.
| Type of Soil | Fertilization | TO (°C) | TP (°C) | TE (°C) | ΔT (°C) | ΔHG (J/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 (A) | ||||||
| Gleyic Chernozem | Control | 60.8 ± 0.7 aB | 65.0 ± 0.1 abcB | 70.7 ± 0.8 aA | 9.9 ± 1.2 aA | 9.07 ± 0.31 abcdA |
| D1 | 59.8 ± 0.3 aA | 64.7 ± 0.1 aA | 70.3 ± 0.3 aA | 10.5 ± 0.6 aA | 11.38 ± 0.27 eB | |
| D2 | 60.7 ± 0.4 aB | 64.9 ± 0.2 abcB | 70.4 ± 0.3 aB | 9.7 ± 0.1 aA | 10.22 ± 0.80 cdeB | |
| D3 | 60.3 ± 0.7 aA | 64.9 ± 0.2 abcB | 70.4 ± 0.1 aA | 10.1 ± 0.7 aA | 10.45 ± 0.22 deB | |
| D4 | 61.0 ± 0.4 aB | 65.7 ± 0.8 cB | 71.5 ± 1.7 aA | 10.5 ± 1.3 aA | 10.11 ± 0.29 cdB | |
| D5 | 60.7 ± 0.0 aB | 65.0 ± 0.1 abcB | 70.4 ± 0.2 aA | 9.7 ± 0.1 aA | 8.58 ± 0.52 abcA | |
| D6 | 60.7 ± 0.5 aB | 65.6 ± 0.4 bcB | 71.6 ± 0.7 aA | 10.9 ± 1.2 aA | 9.32 ± 0.22 bcdB | |
| Haplic Luvisol | Control | 60.1 ± 0.0 aB | 64.6 ± 0.1 aB | 70.1 ± 0.2 aB | 9.9 ± 0.2 aA | 7.90 ± 0.46 abA |
| D1 | 59.8 ± 0.2 aB | 64.8 ± 0.0 abB | 70.6 ± 0.2 aB | 10.8 ± 0.4 aA | 7.86 ± 0.31 aA | |
| D2 | 59.6 ± 0.4 aB | 64.9 ± 0.2 abcB | 70.4 ± 0.3 aB | 10.8 ± 0.6 aA | 10.22 ± 0.80 cdeB | |
| D3 | 59.3 ± 0.2 aB | 64.6 ± 0.0 aB | 70.1 ± 0.4 aA | 10.8 ± 0.6 aA | 9.12 ± 0.09 bcdB | |
| D4 | 59.3 ± 0.6 aB | 64.5 ± 0.1 aB | 70.6 ± 0.5 aA | 11.3 ± 1.1 aA | 7.89 ± 0.14 abA | |
| D5 | 59.8 ± 0.5 aB | 64.6 ± 0.2 aB | 70.2 ± 0.7 aA | 10.4 ± 1.2 aA | 8.58 ± 0.16 abcA | |
| D6 | 60.1 ± 0.5 aB | 65.3 ± 0.3 abcB | 70.4 ± 1.0 aB | 10.3 ± 0.6 aA | 8.60 ± 0.44 abcB | |
| Two-Way ANOVA (p-value) | ||||||
| Type of soil | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.058 | 0.114 | <0.001 | |
| Fertilization | 0.085 | 0.002 | 0.253 | 0.370 | <0.001 | |
| Type of soil × Fertilization | 0.075 | 0.037 | 0.448 | 0.613 | <0.000 | |
| 2020 (B) | ||||||
| Gleyic Chernozem | Control | 58.6 ± 0.4 aA | 63.2 ± 0.1 aA | 69.1 ± 0.3 aA | 10.5 ± 0.7 aA | 9.52 ± 0.09 eA |
| D1 | 59.2 ± 0.8 aA | 63.5 ± 1.1 aA | 69.7 ± 0.9 aA | 10.5 ± 0.1 aA | 7.64 ± 0.43 bcdA | |
| D2 | 58.8 ± 0.2 aA | 62.7 ± 0.2 aA | 68.1 ± 0.6 aA | 9.3 ± 0.2 aA | 6.39 ± 1.19 abA | |
| D3 | 59.6 ± 1.2 aA | 63.3 ± 0.2 aA | 69.7 ± 1.2 aA | 10.1 ± 0.4 aA | 9.04 ± 0.51 deA | |
| D4 | 58.6 ± 0.1 aA | 62.9 ± 0.1 aA | 68.3 ± 0.2 aA | 9.7 ± 0.2 aA | 8.11 ± 0.56 cdeA | |
| D5 | 58.4 ± 0.0 aA | 63.2 ± 0.5 aA | 68.6 ± 0.7 aA | 10.2 ± 0.7 aA | 8.90 ± 0.28 deA | |
| D6 | 58.1 ± 0.4 aA | 62.5 ± 0.7 aA | 67.9 ± 1.1 aA | 9.8 ± 1.0 aA | 6.87 ± 0.61 abcA | |
| Haplic Luvisol | Control | 58.4 ± 0.1 aA | 63.2 ± 0.2 aA | 68.4 ± 0.4 aA | 10.1 ± 0.4 aA | 7.25 ± 0.15 abcA |
| D1 | 57.8 ± 0.4 aA | 62.8 ± 0.3 aA | 68.5 ± 0.1 aA | 10.7 ± 0.3 aA | 6.53 ± 0.60 abA | |
| D2 | 57.9 ± 0.2 aA | 62.8 ± 0.1 aA | 68.4 ± 0.4 aA | 10.6 ± 0.3 aA | 7.02 ± 0.54 abcA | |
| D3 | 58.4 ± 0.2 aA | 63.3 ± 0.1 aA | 68.9 ± 0.9 aA | 10.5 ± 1.0 aA | 7.05 ± 0.30 abcA | |
| D4 | 57.9 ± 0.3 aA | 63.1 ± 0.0 aA | 68.6 ± 0.4 aA | 10.8 ± 0.7 aA | 7.77 ± 0.24 bcdA | |
| D5 | 58.2 ± 0.3 aA | 63.1 ± 0.0 aA | 68.7 ± 0.3 aA | 10.5 ± 0.6 aA | 6.77 ± 0.20 abcA | |
| D6 | 56.5 ± 1.0 aA | 61.7 ± 0.2 aA | 67.5 ± 1.1 aA | 11.1 ± 2.1 aA | 5.85 ± 0.10 aA | |
| Two-Way ANOVA (p-value) | ||||||
| Type of soil | <0.001 | 0.166 | 0.154 | 0.021 | <0.001 | |
| Fertilization | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.016 | 0.853 | <0.001 | |
| Type of soil × Fertilization | 0.191 | 0.214 | 0.409 | 0.448 | <0.001 | |
Data are expressed as means ± SD. Values in columns marked with the same lowercase letters do not differ significantly at a significance level of 0.05. Values marked with the same capital letters indicate no significant differences between the years of the study at a significance level of 0.05. TO—onset temperature, TP—peak temperature, TE—endset temperature, ΔHG—enthalpy of gelatinization, ΔHR—enthalpy of retrogradation, and R—percentage of retrogradation = (ΔHR/ΔHG) × 100. D1–D6: ash fertilization level.