Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 21;13(1):49. doi: 10.3390/foods13010049

Table 4.

Thermodynamic characteristics of gelatinization of barley starch pastes.

Type of Soil Fertilization TO (°C) TP (°C) TE (°C) ΔT (°C) ΔHG (J/g)
2019 (A)
Gleyic Chernozem Control 60.8 ± 0.7 aB 65.0 ± 0.1 abcB 70.7 ± 0.8 aA 9.9 ± 1.2 aA 9.07 ± 0.31 abcdA
D1 59.8 ± 0.3 aA 64.7 ± 0.1 aA 70.3 ± 0.3 aA 10.5 ± 0.6 aA 11.38 ± 0.27 eB
D2 60.7 ± 0.4 aB 64.9 ± 0.2 abcB 70.4 ± 0.3 aB 9.7 ± 0.1 aA 10.22 ± 0.80 cdeB
D3 60.3 ± 0.7 aA 64.9 ± 0.2 abcB 70.4 ± 0.1 aA 10.1 ± 0.7 aA 10.45 ± 0.22 deB
D4 61.0 ± 0.4 aB 65.7 ± 0.8 cB 71.5 ± 1.7 aA 10.5 ± 1.3 aA 10.11 ± 0.29 cdB
D5 60.7 ± 0.0 aB 65.0 ± 0.1 abcB 70.4 ± 0.2 aA 9.7 ± 0.1 aA 8.58 ± 0.52 abcA
D6 60.7 ± 0.5 aB 65.6 ± 0.4 bcB 71.6 ± 0.7 aA 10.9 ± 1.2 aA 9.32 ± 0.22 bcdB
Haplic Luvisol Control 60.1 ± 0.0 aB 64.6 ± 0.1 aB 70.1 ± 0.2 aB 9.9 ± 0.2 aA 7.90 ± 0.46 abA
D1 59.8 ± 0.2 aB 64.8 ± 0.0 abB 70.6 ± 0.2 aB 10.8 ± 0.4 aA 7.86 ± 0.31 aA
D2 59.6 ± 0.4 aB 64.9 ± 0.2 abcB 70.4 ± 0.3 aB 10.8 ± 0.6 aA 10.22 ± 0.80 cdeB
D3 59.3 ± 0.2 aB 64.6 ± 0.0 aB 70.1 ± 0.4 aA 10.8 ± 0.6 aA 9.12 ± 0.09 bcdB
D4 59.3 ± 0.6 aB 64.5 ± 0.1 aB 70.6 ± 0.5 aA 11.3 ± 1.1 aA 7.89 ± 0.14 abA
D5 59.8 ± 0.5 aB 64.6 ± 0.2 aB 70.2 ± 0.7 aA 10.4 ± 1.2 aA 8.58 ± 0.16 abcA
D6 60.1 ± 0.5 aB 65.3 ± 0.3 abcB 70.4 ± 1.0 aB 10.3 ± 0.6 aA 8.60 ± 0.44 abcB
Two-Way ANOVA (p-value)
Type of soil <0.001 0.001 0.058 0.114 <0.001
Fertilization 0.085 0.002 0.253 0.370 <0.001
Type of soil × Fertilization 0.075 0.037 0.448 0.613 <0.000
2020 (B)
Gleyic Chernozem Control 58.6 ± 0.4 aA 63.2 ± 0.1 aA 69.1 ± 0.3 aA 10.5 ± 0.7 aA 9.52 ± 0.09 eA
D1 59.2 ± 0.8 aA 63.5 ± 1.1 aA 69.7 ± 0.9 aA 10.5 ± 0.1 aA 7.64 ± 0.43 bcdA
D2 58.8 ± 0.2 aA 62.7 ± 0.2 aA 68.1 ± 0.6 aA 9.3 ± 0.2 aA 6.39 ± 1.19 abA
D3 59.6 ± 1.2 aA 63.3 ± 0.2 aA 69.7 ± 1.2 aA 10.1 ± 0.4 aA 9.04 ± 0.51 deA
D4 58.6 ± 0.1 aA 62.9 ± 0.1 aA 68.3 ± 0.2 aA 9.7 ± 0.2 aA 8.11 ± 0.56 cdeA
D5 58.4 ± 0.0 aA 63.2 ± 0.5 aA 68.6 ± 0.7 aA 10.2 ± 0.7 aA 8.90 ± 0.28 deA
D6 58.1 ± 0.4 aA 62.5 ± 0.7 aA 67.9 ± 1.1 aA 9.8 ± 1.0 aA 6.87 ± 0.61 abcA
Haplic Luvisol Control 58.4 ± 0.1 aA 63.2 ± 0.2 aA 68.4 ± 0.4 aA 10.1 ± 0.4 aA 7.25 ± 0.15 abcA
D1 57.8 ± 0.4 aA 62.8 ± 0.3 aA 68.5 ± 0.1 aA 10.7 ± 0.3 aA 6.53 ± 0.60 abA
D2 57.9 ± 0.2 aA 62.8 ± 0.1 aA 68.4 ± 0.4 aA 10.6 ± 0.3 aA 7.02 ± 0.54 abcA
D3 58.4 ± 0.2 aA 63.3 ± 0.1 aA 68.9 ± 0.9 aA 10.5 ± 1.0 aA 7.05 ± 0.30 abcA
D4 57.9 ± 0.3 aA 63.1 ± 0.0 aA 68.6 ± 0.4 aA 10.8 ± 0.7 aA 7.77 ± 0.24 bcdA
D5 58.2 ± 0.3 aA 63.1 ± 0.0 aA 68.7 ± 0.3 aA 10.5 ± 0.6 aA 6.77 ± 0.20 abcA
D6 56.5 ± 1.0 aA 61.7 ± 0.2 aA 67.5 ± 1.1 aA 11.1 ± 2.1 aA 5.85 ± 0.10 aA
Two-Way ANOVA (p-value)
Type of soil <0.001 0.166 0.154 0.021 <0.001
Fertilization 0.001 <0.001 0.016 0.853 <0.001
Type of soil × Fertilization 0.191 0.214 0.409 0.448 <0.001

Data are expressed as means ± SD. Values in columns marked with the same lowercase letters do not differ significantly at a significance level of 0.05. Values marked with the same capital letters indicate no significant differences between the years of the study at a significance level of 0.05. TO—onset temperature, TP—peak temperature, TE—endset temperature, ΔHG—enthalpy of gelatinization, ΔHR—enthalpy of retrogradation, and R—percentage of retrogradation = (ΔHR/ΔHG) × 100. D1–D6: ash fertilization level.