Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 21;25(1):138. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010138

Table 2.

Summary of the classification performances on the training set. Data are reported as the mean (SD). Classification metrics were computed on the held-out set for 15 resamples (5-fold cross-validation repeated 3 times) during training. Abbreviations: CE = contrast enhancement; NEC = necrosis; HYP = hyperintensity in FLAIR; TUM = tumor core (union of CE and NEC); WHOLE = whole lesion (union of CE, NEC, and HYP); SVM = support vector machine; RF = random forest; SD = standard deviation; AUC = area under the curve.

Classification Metric WHOLE CE NEC HYP TUM
SVM RF SVM RF SVM RF SVM RF SVM RF
Accuracy, % 61.4 56.6 63.1 58.5 67.6 58.5 60.9 55.9 61.6 56.6
(SD) (6.9) (6.0) (10.0) (6.9) (9.0) (7.2) (6.9) (10.3) (5.0) (7.4)
Sensitivity, % 30.2 29.0 54.1 37.3 59.6 43.5 22.4 26.3 36.5 32.9
(SD) (19.0) (12.7) (15.6) (12.3) (9.9) (8.6) (18.0) (10.9) (18.6) (11.9)
Specificity, % 85.3 77.7 70.1 74.8 73.8 69.8 90.5 78.7 80.7 74.8
(SD) (13.3) (7.4) (16.5) (9.8) (14.0) (11.5) (8.8) (14.4) (15.2) (10.1)
AUC 0.661 0.535 0.688 0.622 0.759 0.615 0.610 0.549 0.669 0.588
(SD) (0.120) (0.100) (0.104) (0.090) (0.069) (0.087) (0.124) (0.100) (0.112) (0.081)