Table 2.
VPA-induced neurocognitive deficits in children.
Authors, Ref. Number. | Main Findings | Comments |
---|---|---|
Bromley et al. [9] | Cochrane Library review demonstrating a high rate of neurodevelopmental problems following prenatal VPA. | A review that covers data from many studies. |
Kini et al. [11] | A high percentage of the 63 VPA-exposed children had a high rate of dysmorphic features and a low verbal intelligence quotient. | VPA-exposed were compared to carbamazepine- and phenytoin-exposed children. |
Bromley et al. [22] | Thirty-one individuals with fetal valproate syndrome; IQ was 19 points lower than controls and 26% had an IQ lower than 70. | The group consisted of children, adolescents, and adults. |
Rithman et al. [24] | Comparison of neurodevelopment in 30 preschool children exposed to VPA and lamotrigine. Those exposed to VPA had lowest scores and increased rate of preschool ADHD. | Relatively small sample. |
Cohen et al. [25] | Children prenatally exposed to VPA monotherapy had lower adaptive abilities and lower learning abilities, especially difficulties in auditory verbal and visual non- verbal functions, in a dose–response manner. They also had a high rate of ADHD. | Worse performance compared to carbamazepine, phenytoin and lamotrigine. |
Christianson et al. [68] | Two twin pairs with fetal valproate syndrome and global developmental delay. | Case reports. |
Moore et al. [63] | Children with fetal valproate syndrome of which 34 were exposed only to VPA and most had neurodevelopmental delay, many with some autistic features. | Among the first to describe autistic features resulting from prenatal VPA. |
Dean et al. [65] | General notice that VPA exposure (and other AEDs induce learning difficulties and behavioral problems. | Gives criteria for the definition of AEDs syndrome. |
Koch et al. [66] | Forty children exposed to AEDs. VPA-exposed had the worse neurodevelopmental outcome. | Relatively few exposed children. |
Nicolai et al. [67] | A review defining the neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal exposure to AEDs. The worst of all is VPA. | A summary of several studies. |
Daugaard et al. [76] | A total of 580 children exposed to VPA; hazard ratio of 4.48 for intellectual disabilities compared to controls. | Some increased risk for intellectual disabilities also in children exposed to carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and clonazepam. |
Dean et al. [69] | A total of 299 children exposed to AEDs, of which 47 were exposed to VPA. MCMs were found in 10.6% and developmental delay was found in 28%, the highest rate among all AEDs. | Many had typical dysmorphic features of the anticonvulsant drug syndrome. |
Vinikainen et al. [70] | A need for educational support in 62% of 13 VPA-exposed children. | Small number of children. |
Adab et al. [71] | Evaluated the educational risk of children prenatally exposed to AEDs. VPA exposure induced a high need of educational support, with an odds ratio of 3.4 compared to non-exposed. | Exposure to VPA had the worst effect in comparison to other AEDs. |
Adab et al. [72] | Retrospective study of 41 school-age children exposed to VPA monotherapy. They had lower mean verbal IQ compared to those with exposure to other AEDs. A negative correlation was found between verbal IQ and dysmorphic features. | Retrospective study showing similar findings to prospective studies. |
Tomson et al. [77] | Meta-analysis of prospective studies. Increased risk of cognitive impairment and autistic traits with VPA. | The risk for anomalies and intellectual impairment with VPA is the highest among several AEDs tested. |
Shallcross et al. [78] | A comparison of neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants younger than two-years old with exposure to levetiracetam versus VPA. VPA induced in 40% of infants a DQ of less than 84. | Levetiracetam exposure did not reduce the DQ of infants. |