Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):177. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010177

Table 2.

Mean BSI-18 scores in the first (T1) and last (T2) week of rehabilitation, stratified across treatment performance on the BSI-18 (T2D).

BSI-18
Performance 1
T1 Post Hoc Tests T1 T2 Post Hoc Tests T2 Time Group Time × Group
M (SD) W-A W-B A-B M (SD) W-A W-B A-B p η 2 p η 2 p η 2
Epistemic
trust
worst 23.5 5.2 23.8 5.5 0.49 <0.01
average 24.6 4.8 25.1 5.2 0.11 <0.01
best 24.5 5.5 25.6 4.4 0.001 0.015
total 24.2 5.2 0.08 0.10 1.0 24.8 5.1 0.011 <0.001 0.74 0.001 0.014 0.001 0.018 0.15 <0.01
Epistemic
mistrust
worst 16.8 4.4 18.1 4.0 <0.001 0.04
average 15.1 4.5 15.1 4.4 1.00 <0.01
best 16.0 4.5 14.9 4.3 <0.001 0.02
total 15.9 4.5 <0.001 0.13 0.07 16.0 4.5 <0.001 <0.001 1.00 0.50 <0.01 <0.001 0.067 <0.001 0.06
Epistemic
credulity
worst 16.1 4.9 17.1 5.0 <0.001 0.02
average 14.1 4.2 14.2 4.3 0.64 <0.01
best 14.6 4.8 14.6 4.5 0.96 <0.01
total 14.9 4.7 <0.001 0.001 0.56 15.3 4.8 <0.001 <0.001 0.84 0.007 0.010 <0.001 0.057 0.006 0.01

T1 = within the first week of rehabilitation treatment; T2 = within the last week of the rehabilitation treatment; 1 T2D BSI-18 scores (i.e., T2 + (T2 − T1)) were divided into three equal groups: best (B), average (A), and worst (W) responders.