Table 1.
Technical highlights of four technical routes in spatial transcriptomics.
In situ hybridization (ISH)-based technologies | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Method | Application | Detection efficiency | Features | Refs |
seqFISH | Fresh-frozen | 84 % | Targeted, expensive experiments | [9], [42] |
MERFISH | Fresh-frozen | 80 % | Targeted, high robustness of probe design method, expensive experiments | [9], [17] |
seqFISH+ | Fresh-frozen | 49 % | Targeted, expensive experiments | [9], [18] |
DSP | Fresh-frozen or FFPE | NA | Targeted, commercially available | [19] |
Split-FISH | Fresh-frozen | NA | Targeted, no tissue clearance required,expensive experiments | [9], [20] |
EEL FISH | Fresh-frozen | 13.2 % | Targeted, transferring RNA using electrophoresis, low-cost experiments | [21] |
SMI | Fresh-frozen or FFPE | One or two copies per cell | Targeted, high signal to noise ratio detection, commercially available | [22] |
In situ sequencing (ISS)-based technologies | ||||
Method | Application | Detection efficiency | Features | Refs |
ISS | Fresh-frozen or FFPE | < 1 % | Targeted, low throughput, commercially available | [42], [103] |
FISSEQ | Fresh-frozen or FFPE | < 0.005 % | Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency,commercially available | [42], [103], [187] |
STARmap | Fresh-frozen | higher than single-cell RNA sequencing | Targeted, reverse transcription-free | [25] |
HybISS | Fresh-frozen or FFPE | higher than ISS | Targeted, higher throughput than ISS | [26] |
BOLORAMIS | Cell lines | 10–30 % | Targeted, reverse transcription-free | [29] |
Next generation sequencing (NGS)-based technologies | ||||
Method | Application | Resolution | Features | Refs |
ST/Visium | Fresh-frozen/Fresh-frozen or FFPE | 100/55 µm | Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency, commercially available | [31], [188], [189] |
slide-seq | Fresh-frozen | 10 µm | Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency | [33] |
HDST | Fresh-frozen | 2 µm | Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency | [34] |
DBiT-seq | Fresh-frozen or FFPE | 10 µm | Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency | [35] |
slide-seqV2 | Fresh-frozen | 10 µm | Unbiased, whole transcriptome, higher capture efficiency than slide-seq | [36] |
Seq-Scope | Fresh-frozen | 0.5–0.8 µm | Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency | [37] |
stereo-seq | Fresh-frozen | 500/715 nm | Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency, largest detection area | [38] |
Spatial information reconstruction technologies | ||||
Method | Application | Algorithm | Features | Refs |
tomo-seq | Fresh-frozen | Iterative Proportional Fitting (IPF) | Unbiased, imaging-free, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency | [40] |
STRP-seq | Fresh-frozen | Tomographer | Unbiased, imaging-free, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency | [41] |