Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 16;21:940–955. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.01.016

Table 1.

Technical highlights of four technical routes in spatial transcriptomics.

In situ hybridization (ISH)-based technologies
Method Application Detection efficiency Features Refs
seqFISH Fresh-frozen 84 % Targeted, expensive experiments [9], [42]
MERFISH Fresh-frozen 80 % Targeted, high robustness of probe design method, expensive experiments [9], [17]
seqFISH+ Fresh-frozen 49 % Targeted, expensive experiments [9], [18]
DSP Fresh-frozen or FFPE NA Targeted, commercially available [19]
Split-FISH Fresh-frozen NA Targeted, no tissue clearance required,expensive experiments [9], [20]
EEL FISH Fresh-frozen 13.2 % Targeted, transferring RNA using electrophoresis, low-cost experiments [21]
SMI Fresh-frozen or FFPE One or two copies per cell Targeted, high signal to noise ratio detection, commercially available [22]
In situ sequencing (ISS)-based technologies
Method Application Detection efficiency Features Refs
ISS Fresh-frozen or FFPE < 1 % Targeted, low throughput, commercially available [42], [103]
FISSEQ Fresh-frozen or FFPE < 0.005 % Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency,commercially available [42], [103], [187]
STARmap Fresh-frozen higher than single-cell RNA sequencing Targeted, reverse transcription-free [25]
HybISS Fresh-frozen or FFPE higher than ISS Targeted, higher throughput than ISS [26]
BOLORAMIS Cell lines 10–30 % Targeted, reverse transcription-free [29]
Next generation sequencing (NGS)-based technologies
Method Application Resolution Features Refs
ST/Visium Fresh-frozen/Fresh-frozen or FFPE 100/55 µm Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency, commercially available [31], [188], [189]
slide-seq Fresh-frozen 10 µm Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency [33]
HDST Fresh-frozen 2 µm Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency [34]
DBiT-seq Fresh-frozen or FFPE 10 µm Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency [35]
slide-seqV2 Fresh-frozen 10 µm Unbiased, whole transcriptome, higher capture efficiency than slide-seq [36]
Seq-Scope Fresh-frozen 0.5–0.8 µm Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency [37]
stereo-seq Fresh-frozen 500/715 nm Unbiased, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency, largest detection area [38]
Spatial information reconstruction technologies
Method Application Algorithm Features Refs
tomo-seq Fresh-frozen Iterative Proportional Fitting (IPF) Unbiased, imaging-free, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency [40]
STRP-seq Fresh-frozen Tomographer Unbiased, imaging-free, whole transcriptome, low capture efficiency [41]