Skip to main content
The World Journal of Men's Health logoLink to The World Journal of Men's Health
. 2023 Jun 15;42(1):133–147. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230016

Medical Treatment for Peyronie’s Disease: Systematic Review and Network Bayesian Meta-Analysis

Hyun Young Lee 1,*, Jong Hyun Pyun 2,*, Sung Ryul Shim 3,†,, Jae Heon Kim 1,
PMCID: PMC10782133  PMID: 37382281

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy of medical treatment options for Peyronie's disease (PD) including oral drugs, intralesional treatment and mechanical treatment compared with placebo treatment using network meta-analysis (NMA).

Materials and Methods

We searched the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PD in PubMed, Cochrane library, and EMBASE up to October 2022. RCTs included medical treatment options: oral drugs, intralesional treatment and mechanical treatment. Studies reporting at least one of the outcome measures of interest including curvature degree, plaque size, and structured questionnaires (International Index of Erectile Function, IIEF) were included.

Results

Finally, 24 studies including 1,643 participants met our selection criteria for NMA. There was no statistically significant treatment compared to placebo of the curvature degree, plaque size, IIEF in Bayesian analysis. The SUCRA values of ranking probabilities for each treatment performance, which indicated that hyperthermia device ranked first in NMA. However, in frequentist analysis, 7 of mono treatments (coenzyme Q10 [CoQ10] 300 mg, hyperthermia device, interferon alpha 2b, pentoxifylline 400 mg, propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g, penile traction therapy [PTT], vitamin E 300 mg) and 2 of combination treatments (“PTT–extracorporeal shockwave treatment”, “vitamin E 300 mg–propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g”) were statistically significant for improvement of curvature degree, and 9 of mono treatments (CoQ10 300 mg, hyaluronic acid 16 mg, hyperthermia device, interferon alpha 2b, pentoxifylline 400 mg, propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g, verapamil 10 mg, vitamin E 300 mg, vitamin E 400 U) and 3 of combination treatments ("interferon alpha 2b–vitamin E 400 U", "verapamil 10 mg–antioxidants", “vitamin E 300 mg–propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g”) were statistically significant in the improvement of plaque size.

Conclusions

At present, there is no clinical treatment alternatives that have been demonstrated to be effective compared to placebo. Nonetheless, as the frequentist approach has shown that a number of agents are efficacious, further research is expected to develop more effective treatment options.

Keywords: Administration, topical; Erectile dysfunction; Oral medicine; Penile induration; Practice management

INTRODUCTION

A frequently arising psychosexual disorder, Peyronie’s disease (PD) typically presents with discomfort, curvature and or/deformity of the penis in association with palpable plaque(s) and erectile dysfunction (ED) [1]. The condition generally tends to become more severe over time, a situation that is evident in over 50% of patients without therapeutic intervention [2]. A number of factors are likely to contribute to the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying PD [1], although one possible etiology for the development of penile plaques is recurring injury to an erect penis [3,4]. The latter disturbs the structure of the tunica albuginea; this is associated with the liberation of a range of cytokines and growth factors, e.g. transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1. Macrophage and fibroblast replication additionally arise which lead to surplus fibrin and collagen being laid down [5], and ultimately, disarray of the extracellular matrix and cell shrinkage. Fibroblasts dedifferentiate into myofibroblasts, thus precipitating the development of fibrous plaques between the strata of the tunica [6]. Remodeling of plaques and distortion of penile morphology may be hastened by matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibiting factors [7].

To date, there is little known about the exact mechanisms underlying PD and the associated fibrotic conditions. TGF-β has been recognized as a key contributor to fibrotic change, but the latter process includes numerous pathways, together with an abundance of mediating cytokines and growth factors, many of which are yet to be delineated in patients with PD. A broad spectrum of management strategies is employed in patients with PD. Although clinical recommendations have been published, the therapeutic options selected are mainly governed by the experiences and knowledge of the treating doctor [1]. Despite the existence of a number of systematic reviews which describe the efficacy of drug therapies, no analyses have yet been published which evaluate the general results of the more conservative options, which include oral, intralesional and mechanical types of treatment. These options are essential as these are advised by the published treatment recommendations in the first instance, except where the patient expresses a desire for a more long-term solution and is willing to take the risk associated with operative reconstructive techniques [8,9]. Russo et al [10] reported that Clostridium histolyticum and interferon alpha 2b showed the best outcome in terms of penile curvature, whereas hyaluronic acid was most efficient in relation to erectile function in the meta-analysis comparing all available intralesional treatment for PD. Bakr and El-Sakka [11] reported extracorporeal shockwave treatment (ESWT) fails to improve penile curvature or pain in men with PD, although ESWT may reduce plaque size. Pyrgidis et al [12] reported the result of available combination treatment modalities in their randomized or observational comparative studies assessing any conservative combination therapies for PD.

The aim of the current review is to investigate the clinical treatment choices available. These encompass oral, intralesional and mechanical types of treatment, and their effectiveness is judged against the use of a placebo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We registered the study protocol in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42022372906). The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [13].

The PRISMA Checklist are included as a Supplement Materials. The inclusion criteria were defined using the population, intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) method (Supplement Table 1).

1. Data sources and literature searches

We searched the PubMed and Cochrane library using the MeSH (Medical Subject Headings terms) and text keywords to identify reports published up to October 2022. We included all full-text publications reporting the outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PD patients treated with medical treatment including oral drug, injectional therapy, and mechanical therapy. Studies reporting at least one of the outcome measures of interest including curvature degree, plaque size, and structured questionnaires (International Index of Erectile Function, IIEF) were included in the meta-analysis.

The subject headings and text keywords included those related to the population (male patients with PD), interventions & comparisons (15 mono treatment): (1) oral drug (colchicine, colchicine 1 mg, coenzyme Q10 [CoQ10] 300 mg, vitamin E 400 U, vitamin E 300 mg, pentoxifylline 400 mg, propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g, verapamil 10 mg, and antioxidants); (2) injectional therapy (collagenase clostridium histolyticum [CCH], hyaluronic acid 16 mg, and interferon alpha 2b); (3) mechanical therapy (ESWT, hyperthermia device, penile traction therapy [PTT]) and 4 combination treatment (“interferon alpha 2b–vitamin E 400 U”, “vitamin E 300 mg–propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g”, “PTT–ESWT”, and “verapamil 10 mg–antioxidants”). The search terms were grouped according to Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT). The same search strategy was adopted for EMBASE using Emtree (EMBASE subject headings). Additional studies were screened by two independent investigators (SR Shim and JH Kim) through manual search of clinical trial databases and our search strategy is provided in Supplement Table 1.

2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for study selection

The inclusion criteria for relevant studies were as follows: (1) patients with a diagnosis of with PD; (2) the outcome was curvature degree, plaque size, and IIEF; (3) duplicated publications were excluded, as were publications that did not contain original data, such as review articles, case reports, conference abstracts, editorials, letters, and guidelines; (4) human-based RCTs rather than cross-over design. Exclusion criteria were as follow: (1) non-human RCTs and (2) no comparison groups (3) surgical treatment. Two investigators (SR Shim and JH Kim) performed an independent initial screening by title and abstracts of all the articles using the predefined inclusion criteria. All of the researchers independently reviewed the full-text articles to see if they met the inclusion criteria. Furthermore, the same authors independently extracted data using a data extraction form. The final inclusion of each article was determined by all investigators through evaluation and discussion. To ensure the integrity of the meta-analysis and the absence of overlapping data, the references and data for each included study were cross-checked. Disagreements were resolved via consensus among the co-authors.

3. Data extraction and measurement outcomes

Details of the basic study information (first author, publication year, country, and follow-up period), patient characteristics (number of patients and age range), and technical aspects (inclusion & exclusion criteria, and treatments) were extracted from the included articles, using a predefined data extraction form. In one study, when there were several treatment durations, the effect size was calculated in the last part, and if there were several dose ranges, the highest dose was set, and the dose was converted based on daily dosage. Only studies providing complete information were included in the final meta-analysis.

4. Data analysis

For Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA), specific graphical analysis was completed using the “gemtc” package in R software v.4.2.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Analyses according to previously described technical implementation of the Bayesian method using R software was performed. First, a prior distribution and the likelihood were calculated from the present data, and a Bayesian hierarchical model was created in NMA. Second, after Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation, and a distribution that best converges the posterior distribution was set. The probability of stable distribution and the area under the posterior distribution function were determined through the MCMC simulation. Finally, statistical reasoning for the treatment effect was performed with the determined posterior distribution. Therefore, the Bayesian NMA was used to analyze the posterior distribution, even though it is not a standard distribution generally used in statistics. Particularly for the MCMC simulation, we selected the random effect model that had four chains, 5,000 burn-ins, 30,000 iterations, and an interval of 5 to sufficiently remove the effect of initial values, increase the iterations and extraction interval, and minimize the MCMC error and the deviance information criterion variation with almost no variations and stability of various plots. For additional analysis, we also conducted a frequentist NMA based on a graph-theoretical approach using the “netmeta” package.

For consistency assumption of NMA, we performed node-splitting assessments to determine the association between the direct and indirect treatment comparisons. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to calculate the probability of each treatment being the most effective method based on a Bayesian approach using probability values to facilitate interpretation of treatment performance; the larger the SUCRA value was, the higher the rank of the intervention [14,15]

The analysis pooled the mean difference (curvature degree and IIEF) and standardized mean difference (plaque size) and 95% credible intervals (CrI). A two-sided p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. We assessed publication bias (or small-study effects) using a funnel plot. We also used the Egger test (i.e., linear regression test of funnel plot asymmetry) when assessing the publication bias.

5. Quality assessment

The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality. We evaluated five parameters: 1) randomization process; 2) deviations from the intended interventions; 3) missing outcome data; 4) measurement of the outcome; and 5) selection of the reported result. Each domain was assigned a risk of bias rating of high, low, or unclear. The overall risk of bias was considered to be low if all domains were rated as “Low,” some concerns if even one domain was rated as “Some concerns,” and high risk if even one domain was rated as “High,” or more than two domains were received the “Some concerns” [16,17].

RESULTS

1. Study selection

The initial search identified a total of 217 articles from electronic databases (PubMed, 53; Cochrane, 54; EMBASE, 10), of which 95 were unrelated to the topic, contained overlapping data, or appeared in more than one database and were excluded. After a more detailed review, an additional 56 papers that were not adequate publication type were eliminated. After full-text assessments, 66 studies were eligible for full-text review. Of these, 42 were further excluded for the following reasons: not RCT (n=9), not treatment for PD (n=6), not PD (n=3), no quantitative outcome (n=13), editorial comment (n=1), IRB submission paper (n=1), not enough sample size (n=4), not English (n=5) (Fig. 1, Table 1). Finally, 24 studies including 1,643 participants met our selection criteria for NMA, among which 2-arm, 3-arm, and 4-arm studies were 12, 1, and 1 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. Flow diagram. RCT: randomized controlled trial.

Fig. 1

Table 1. Characteristics of all studies included in meta-analysis.

Author (year) Journal Country No. of patients Subject description Experimental description
Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Treatment F/U duration
Rehman et al (1998) [1] Urology United States 14 35–70 years, previous discontinuation of medication for PD at least 3 months Oral calcium antagonist Placebo 3 months
Verapanil 10 mg injection once a week
Safarinejad (2004) [2] Int J Impot Res Iran 84 PD All medical therapy within 8 weeks Placebo 4 months
Oral colchicine 1 mg daily
Perugia et al (2005) [3] Int J Hyperthermia Italy 60 Advanced PD with pain during intercourse, penile curvature affecting vaginal penetration and/or ED Taking PDE-5 inhibitor, history of PD treatment Local hyperthermia device (FLEXITERM CX 2000) Twice a week 6 months
Single injection of verapamil 10 mg (1 mg/cc)
Kendirci et al (2005) [4] J Sex Med United States 39 Age ≥18 years, PD >12 month, penile curvature <30 degrees on erection Placebo (normal saline 10 mL) injection per week 12 weeks
Interferon α2b 5×106 unit+normal saline 10 mL injection per week
Inal et al (2006) [5] Urology Turkey 30 Early stage of PD within 6 months History of penile surgery, pelvic trauma, medication for PD Interferon-α2b 5MU injection 12 weeks
Oral vitamin E 400 U twice daily
Interferon-α2b 5MU injection+oral vitamin E 400 U twice daily
Cavallini et al (2007) [6] Urology Italy 77 Chronic PD patients PSA >4 mg/mL, medical treatment for PD or ED, recurrent PD, hormonal abnormality, pelvic surgery history, myocardial or cerebral ischemia within 6 mo., major surgery, alcohol or tobacco abuse, untreated diabetes, hypertension or hypotension Verapamil 10 mg+normal saline 4 mL injection once in 2 weeks 24 weeks
Verapamil 10 mg+normal saline 10 mL injection once in 2 weeks
Verapamil 10 mg+normal saline 20 mL injection once in 2 weeks
Greenfield et al (2007) [7] J Urol United States 42 PD patients Verapamil injection l therapy for PD, ventral plaque, extensive plaque calcification Normal saline 4 cc injection+electropromotive device twice a week 3 months
Verapamil 10 mg/NS 4 cc injection+electropromotive device twice a week
Safarinejad et al (2007) [8] J Urol Iran 274 Primary PD, onset more than 12 months Organic cause of PD Placebo 6 months
Oral vitamin E 300 mg twice daily
Oral propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g twice daily
Oral vitamin E 300 mg+Oral propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g twice daily
Palmieri et al (2009) [9] Eur Urol Italy 100 Age between 18–75 years, only one plaque with maximum size of 3.75 cm², no previous medical or surgical therapies for PD, stable sexual relationship, painful erection with VAS ≥5, ED, penis recurvatum Blood coagulation disorder, cardiac pacemaker, lower urinary infection, vascular disorder in the path of the shock waves Placebo 24 weeks
ESWT
Chitale et al (2010) [10] BJU Int United Kingdom 36 Stable PD over 6 months, age >18 years, palpable plaque along the penis with deformity Congenital curvature of the penis, previous treatment for PD (surgical/medical), on wafarin, patient with total ED in need of therapy for ED Placebo (sham treatment) 6 months
Shock wave therapy
Safarinejad (2010) [11] Int J Impot Res Iran 186 18–60 years, at least 2 previous failed medical treatment for PD, reported ED with painful penile curvature at least 12 months, presence of ED without any obvious organic causes other than PD, presence of penile plaque with a maximum size of 2 cm², stable sexual relationship, presence of painful erection and penile recurvatum Other sexual dysfunction, absence of penile curvature, history of penile surgery or pelvic trauma, endocrinopathy, serum creatinine >1.8 mg/100 mL, alcohol or tobacco use, supplemenation with vitamins or traditional herb in previous 3 mo, therapies interfering with CoQ10 such as antioxidants Placebo 24 weeks
Oral CoQ10 300 mg once daily
Safarinejad et al (2010) [12] BJU Int Iran 228 Early chronic PD, history of ≥12 months, previous treatment of PD, presence of ED as IIEF <26, no history of penile surgery or pelvic trauma Medical treatment for sexual dysfunction, recurrent PD, endocrinopathy, serum creatinine >1.8 mg/100 mL, chronic liver disease, alcohol or tobacco use, age >60 years, supplementation of vitamins or traditional herb in previous 3mo., therapies interfering with pentoxifylline Placebo 6 months
Pentoxifylline 400 mg twice daily
Mehrsai et al (2013) [13] Andrology Iran 30 Disease period <2 years, presence of pain on erection, penile deviation <45 degree, ability to perform vaginal intercourse Calcified plaque, ED referable to psychological, neurological, hormonal or vascular causes, contraindication to the use of verapamil of dexamethasone, history of diabetes, congenital penile curvature or chordee with hypospadias 10 mg verapamil+4 mg dexamethasone+2 mL distilled water with TEA weekly 3 months
10 mg verapamil+4 mg dexamethasone+2 mL distilled water with intralesional injection weekly
Favilla et al (2014) [14] Andrologia Italy 113 Acute phase of PD Previous medical or surgical treatment for PD, IIEF-5 score <22, any medical treatment for sexual dysfunction before or during the study, stabilized PD symptoms (>12 mo), completely calcified plaques at USG, congenital penile curvature or chordee with hypospodias, age >75 yr, coagulation disorders or severe cardiovascular disease, hypogonadism Verapamil 10 mg+5 mL saline, intralesional injection weekly for 12 weeks 3 months
Verapamil 10 mg+5 mL saline, intralesional injection weekly for 12 weeks, oral antioxidants once daily
Ozturk et al (2014) [15] Ir J Med Sci Turkey 39 Primary PD with no longer than 6 months, non-calcified plaque Previous treatment for PD or ED, hormonal abnormality, alcohol or tobacco abuse, hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes Oral vitamin E 400 IU daily sildenafil 50 mg daily 12 weeks
Toscano et al (2016) [16] Int Braz J Urol Brazil 25 PD patient Penile trauma, PD with longer than 18months, medical or surgical treatment history for PD, history of using colchicine or verapamil within 3 months Thiocolchicine 4 mg+2 mL saline intralesional injection weekly 7 weeks
Verapamil 5 mg+2 mL saline intralesional injection weekly
Favilla et al (2017) [17] Andrology Italy 132 Age >18 years, IIEF-5 score >11, acute phase of PD chronic or fibrotic phase of PD, previous medical or surgical or EWST treatment for PD, calcified plaque or hourglass deformity as defined at USG, IIEF score <7, any medical treatment for ED before or during study, severe penile curvature incompatible with sexual intercourse Verapamil 10 mg+5 mL saline intralesional injection weekly 12 weeks
Hyaluronic acid 16 mg/2 mL injection weekly
Ralph et al (2017) [18] J Sex Med Egypt 30 Age ≥18 years, stable symptomatic PD Penile curvature <30 degree or >90 degree, hourglass deformity, compromised penile hemodynamics, significant ED that failed to respond to oral PDE-5 inhibitor, priapism history, calcified plaque, previous medical treatment for PD within 3months, previous surgery for PD Collagenase clostridium histolyticum 0.58 mg injection+vacuum-pump therapy+plaque modeling 36 weeks
Collagenase clostridium histolyticum 0.58 mg injection+vacuumpump therapy
Alom et al (2019) [19] J Sex Med United States 113 PD with >30 degree curvature Previous PD therapies, plaque calcification, hourglass deformities, multiplanar curvature 0.9 mg Collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections 24 weeks
0.9 mg Collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections+penile traction therapy (other device)
0.9 mg Collagenase clostridium histolyticum injections+penile traction therapy (RestoreX device)
Ziegelmann et al (2019) [20] J Urol United States 110 Age ≥18 years with PD Penile curvature <30 degrees, stretched penile length <7 cm, diabetes with end-organ failure, ED unresponsive to PDE-5 inhibitor or penile injection Placebo (no treatment) 3 months
Penile traction therapy with Restore X device daily
Joseph et al (2020) [21] J Sex Med United States 64 Age ≥18 years with PD Penile curvature <30 degrees, stretched penile length <7 cm, diabetes with end-organ failure, ED unresponsive to PDE-5 inhibitor or penile injection Penile traction therapy to penile traction therapy 3 months
placebo to penile traction therapy with Restore X device daily
Cai et al (2021) [22] World J Mens Health Italy 81 Age >18 years, acute phase of PD, IIEF score >11 Allergy to study medication, reluctance to penile injection, previous treatment for PD Hyaluronic acid 150 mg PO per 48 h+hyaluronic acid intralesional injection (16 mg/2 mL) per week 6 weeks
Hyaluronic acid intralesional injection (16 mg/2 mL) per week
Mortensen et al (2021) [23] Res Rep Urol Denmark 30 Age with 18–80 years, diagnosed with PD more than 6 months, stable phase of PD, penile curvature 20–90 degrees Previous penile surgery or ESWT treatment Vacuum pump+sham ESWT 6 months
Vacuum pump+ESWT once a week for 5 weeks
Chung and Wang (2022) [24] Investig Clin Urol Australia 50 Age ≥18 years, stable PD( penile deformity unchanged for 6 months), failed oral therapy, presence of palpable plaque, single axis penile curvature(<90 degree) Presence of hinge or lateral indentation or hourglass deformity, previous surgical treatment for PD, IIEF-15 score ≤16 Verapamil 10 mg+saline 4 mL intralesional injection 24 months
Collagenase clostridium histolyticum 0.58 mg injection+0.5 mL saline intralesional injection

All references in Table 1 are available in the Supplement Material.

F/U: follow-up, PD: Peyronie's disease, ED: erectile dysfunction, PDE-5 inhibitor: phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, PSA: prostate specific antigen, VAS: visual analogue scale, ESWT: extracorporeal shock wave therapy, TEA: transdermal electromotive administration, IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function, USG: ultrasonography.

Fig. 2. Network plot. (A) Curvature dgree, (B) plaque size, (C) IIEF_sub network 1, (D) IIEF_sub network 2. IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function, PTT: penile traction therapy, ESWT: extracorporeal shockwave treatment, CCH: collagenase clostridium histolyticum, CoQ10: coenzyme Q10.

Fig. 2

2. Quality assessment

We evaluated the twenty-four PD studies using the five RoB 2 domains to determine the risk of bias for the included studies. In D1, one study was classified as “High”. In D2, four studies and one study were classified as “Some concerns” and “No information.” In D3, four studies were classified as “Some concerns.” In D4 and D5, all studies were classified as “Low” or “Some concerns.” Based on these evaluations, the overall risk of bias was ranked. Fourteen studies were classified as “Low,” six studies as “Some concerns,” and four studies as “High” (Supplement Fig. 1).

3. Outcomes

In curvature degree, a total of 1,643 patients from 14 direct comparison trials were included 21 effect sizes with 18 treatments. There was no statistically significant treatment compared to placebo in Bayesian analysis. Of these, 7 of mono treatments (CoQ10 300 mg, hyperthermia device, interferon alpha 2b, pentoxifylline 400 mg, propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g, PTT, vitamin E 300 mg) and 2 of combination treatments (“PTT–ESWT”, “vitamin E 300 mg–propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g”) were statistically significant in frequentist NMA. The pooled overall mean differences of curvature degree were -32.500 (95% CrI: -52.245, -7.755) in hyperthermia device, -25.700 (95% CrI: -26.866, -24.534) in CoQ10 300 mg, -18.900 (95% CrI: -20.004, -17.796) in pentoxifylline 400 mg (Fig. 3 and Supplement Fig. 2).

Fig. 3. Network meta-analysis forest plot. (A) Curvature dgree, (B) plaque size, (C) IIEF_sub network 1, (D) IIEF_sub network 2. IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function, PTT: penile traction therapy, ESWT: extracorporeal shockwave treatment, CCH: collagenase clostridium histolyticum, CoQ10: coenzyme Q10, CrI: credible intervals.

Fig. 3

In plaque size, a total of 1,398 patients from 11 direct comparison trials were included 18 effect sizes with 15 treatments. There was no statistically significant treatment compared to placebo in Bayesian analysis. Of these, 9 of mono treatments (CoQ10 300 mg, hyaluronic acid 16 mg, hyperthermia device, interferon alpha 2b, pentoxifylline 400 mg, propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g, verapamil 10 mg, vitamin E 300 mg, vitamin E 400 U) and 3 of combination treatments (“interferon alpha 2b–vitamin E 400 U”, “verapamil 10 mg–antioxidants”, “vitamin E 300 mg–propionyl-L-carnitine 1g”) were statistically significant in frequentist NMA. The pooled overall standardized mean differences of plaque size were -4.486 (95% CrI: -5.865, -3.108) in hyperthermia device,-1.850 (95% CrI: -3.000, -0.701) in “interferon alpha 2b–vitamin E 400 U”, -1.832 (95% CrI: -2.142, -1.523) in pentoxifylline 400 mg (Fig. 3, Supplement Fig. 2).

In IIEF, a total of 1,271 patients from 4 direct comparison trials (CCH, hyaluronic acid 16 mg, hyperthermia device, verapamil 10 mg, “verapamil 10 mg–antioxidants”) and 5 direct comparison trials (CoQ10 300 mg, pentoxifylline 400 mg, placebo, ESWT, PTT, PTT–ESWT) were two separated treatment network groups, thus we approached for each treatment groups. There was no statistically significant in Bayesian analysis. Of these, 3 of mono treatments (CoQ10 300 mg, pentoxifylline 400 mg, PTT) and 1 of combination treatments (“PTT–ESWT”) was statistically significant in frequentist NMA. The pooled overall mean differences of IIEF were 11.700 (95% CrI: 8.788, 14.612) in pentoxifylline 400 mg, 8.900 (95% CrI: 8.331, 9.469) in CoQ10 300 mg, 7.030 (95% CrI: 2.817, 11.243) in PTT_ESWT (Fig. 3, Supplement Fig. 2).

Fig. 4 shows the SUCRA values of ranking probabilities for each treatment performance, which indicated that hyperthermia device ranked first in NMA.

Fig. 4. SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve probabilities). (A) Curvature dgree; (B) plaque size; (C) IIEF_sub network 1; (D) IIEF_sub network 2. IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function, PTT: penile traction therapy, ESWT: extracorporeal shockwave treatment, CCH: collagenase clostridium histolyticum, CoQ10: coenzyme Q10.

Fig. 4

4. Inconsistency test

The inconsistency tests for NMA assumption were analyzed using the node-splitting method, and the results indicated consistency among the direct and indirect evidence of all outcomes. Therefore, a consistency model was applied in the current study (all p>0.05).

5. Publication bias

The statistical approaches for the detection of publication bias or small-study effect in fifty-nine studies are shown in Supplement Fig. 3. Egger’s regression (two-tailed p=0.795) and a visual inspection of symmetry graphic in the funnel plot suggested that there was no evidence of publication bias or small-study effect in this NMA.

DISCUSSION

The potential efficacy of all the investigated therapeutic alternatives was demonstrated in the current study in comparison to a placebo, using a Bayesian analytical technique. A frequentist approach demonstrated that, when judged against a placebo, a number of treatments led to an attenuation of penile curvature and plaque dimensions (Supplement Materials). The Bayesian technique was utilized and acknowledged as it had greater robustness than the frequentist approach, especially in the presence of a low study number. A positive likelihood of a remedial effect was established. Nevertheless, as pharmaceutical agents were determined to exhibit efficacy through the frequentist approach, it is anticipated that more efficacious treatments will undergo innovation after additional research has been performed.

The complicated mechanisms underlying PD form the principal hindrance to the lack of currently applicable standard treatment. It has been established that a number of key processes relating to extracellular inflammatory and fibrotic reaction mediators are involved in PD, although numerous pathways within the cells have yet to be fully delineated. The TGF-β pathway has been recognized as a major actor in the development of fibrosis [18]. The TGF-β is an early mediator produced in response to cell damage and stimulates myoblast proliferation and collagen production. This process is known to be involved in PD from the animal study [19]. TGF-β also inhibits production of mediators involved in collagenolysis and fibrinolysis, resulting in excess collagen deposition within the ECM, which then leads to plaque formation in PD [20]. TGF-β can also increase production of reactive oxygen species, and has been implicated in plaque calcification through osteoblast differentiation [21]. In addition to TGF-β, other cytokines have been implicated in the pathogenesis of PD. Some of the pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in PD include interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-2 β, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, connective tissue growth factor, and others [22]. However, molecular pathways associated with fibrosis within specific viscera have not yet been described in penile tissue [23,24]. Previous research at the intracellular molecular level in PD has generally centered on the TGF-β pathway, but gaining additional comprehension of alternative mechanisms that trigger fibrotic change could facilitate the presentation of de novo therapeutic targets in patients with PD.

Therapeutic goals in PD include promoting erectile function and lack of sexual discomfort; this is achieved by endeavoring to slow advancement of the pathology and to diminish plaque formation and the curvature of the penis. Presently available treatments encompass drugs, which are generally indicated early in the pathology, minimally invasive options, e.g., CCH, and corrective surgery, which is only indicated once the pathology becomes stable. The efficiency of CCH has been substantiated by high-level evidence, although no difference in effectiveness to a placebo was found in the current study.

The clinical endpoint triad selected in this review comprised the degree of penile curvature, plaque dimensions and international index of erective function. No efficacy in relation to these endpoints was determined following therapy using the Bayesian approach, but the frequentist method indicated that, versus a placebo, a number of therapeutic options for PD led to a reduction in penile curvature and plaque measurements (Supplement Materials).

The Bayesian method generated an ordered treatment ranking of mechanical therapy, CoQ10, pentoxifylline given orally and CCH (Fig. 4). Despite the fact that this analytical strategy failed to indicate the efficacy of the therapeutic choices compared to a placebo in PD, the frequentist method highlighted a number of treatments deemed to be effective, i.e. mechanical treatment, CoQ10, oral pentoxifylline and interferon alpha 2b (Supplement Fig. 2).

The evidence to support mechanical therapy iontophoresis or transdermal electromotive pharmaceutical agent delivery remains unsubstantiated and so the potential use of these options in patients with PD merits additional research [1,2]. The energy transferred to the tunica rather than the immediate actions of the medication per se may account for the curvature decrease seen. There are few adverse events associated with iontophoresis, although the dispersive electrodes may induce temporary dermal reddening. The length of the penis can be enhanced, and deformity and discomfort diminished by PTT [25]. The frequentist method employed in the current study demonstrated that in contrast to a placebo, patients with PD received benefits from mechanical treatments, such as a hyperthermal device, and mechanical treatment with PTT together with ESWT. The same analysis method indicated that pentoxifylline was also efficacious against a placebo as a therapeutic option in PD.

Pentoxifylline and colchicine, in combination with PTT, forms an expedient treatment option which is cheap and efficacious for the penile distortion and plaque relating to PD [26]. Pentoxifylline has been demonstrated in fibroblasts derived from the tunica albuginea in vitro to promote collagen metabolism, to diminish fibrous tissue formation and to restrict elastogenesis [27]. In the current study, the frequentist method demonstrated the effectiveness of pentoxifylline against placebo.

A fat-soluble, vitamin-like quinone, which is the sole lipid-soluble antioxidant produced endogenously, CoQ10 (2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-decaprenyl-1,4-benzoquinone, and also referred to as ubiquinone or ubidecarenone) undergoes reduction via a semiubiquinone radical, CoQ10H, to form ubiquinole (CoQ10H2) [28]. In pathologies linked with oxidative stress, diminished serum CoQ10 titers [29] and a reduced CoQ10H2:CoQ10 ratio [30] have been detected. Treatment with CoQ10 in early stage ongoing PD diminishes the dimensions of the plaque and relieves penile curvature. The frequentist method indicated that compared with a placebo, CoQ10 appeared effective as a therapeutic option in PD.

Interferon is a protein of a low molecular weight. Its effects as a modulatory factor on the immune response via a spectrum of anti-proliferative mechanisms is well-established; an equilibrium of pro- and anti-inflammatory agent expression is achieved through interferon alpha-2b. The latter, administered as either a lone agent or together with PTT, led to a modest reduction in penile curvature when compared with the use of a placebo.

Pyrgidis et al [12] reported the result of available combination treatment modalities including the addition of adjunctive mechanical therapies to CCH, do not improve symptoms further compared with monotherapy and should not be implemented in patients with active or stable PD. Our findings indicate that 2 of combination treatments (“PTT–ESWT”, “vitamin E 300 mg–propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g”) in penile curvature, 3 of combination treatments (“interferon alpha 2b–vitamin E 400 U”, “verapamil 10 mg–antioxidants”, “vitamin E 300 mg–propionyl-L-carnitine 1 g”) and combination treatments (“PTT–ESWT”) in IIEF were statistically significant in frequentist NMA. Combination treatment has emerged as a promising treatment modality when monotherapy alone is less effective. Regenerative medicine represents a novel therapy for the treatment of PD using mesenchymal stem cell therapy with both curative and preventive potential [31]. Stem cells can be used in tissue engineering to repair a disrupted process [32]. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of stem cell therapy for the treatment of PD, although studies involving humans have been limited by their small samples and brief follow-up [31]. Further research including RCT in humans is need to prove that stem cell therapy is promising for the treatment of PD.

The pathways that are involved in the susceptibility of specific viscera to fibrosis or to systemic fibrosis require additional delineation in order to gain a more comprehensive appreciation of the shared molecular changes that may underlie the fibrosis seen in PD; such an understanding would also offer further information relating to additional benign disorders of the urology system, e.g., ED. A requisite for the innovation of de novo treatments for either disease prevention or modification is a comprehensive understanding of the spectrum of signaling pathways responsible for fibrosis in PD. Therapies in the future may be most efficacious if interventions were directed toward a number of molecular targets within the fibrotic process owing to pathway redundancy.

Although we have described the useful options of the frequentist approach in addition to Bayesian analysis, the interpretation of the tendency obtained through the frequentist approach should be very cautious due to the number of studies and heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, there are no clinical treatment alternatives which, when contrasted against a placebo, have demonstrated effectiveness. These findings may reflect the restricted available information relating to the disease mechanisms underlying PD and the associated fibrotic conditions. Nevertheless, as the frequentist approach indicated that a number of pharmaceutical agents were efficacious, it is anticipated that more effective therapeutic options will be developed following further research.

Acknowledgements

None.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Funding: This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

Author Contribution:
  • Conceptualization: JHK.
  • Data curation: SRS.
  • Formal analysis: HYL.
  • Methodology: SRS.
  • Project administration: JHP.
  • Resources: HYL.
  • Visualization: JHP.
  • Writing – original draft: HYL.
  • Writing – review & editing: JHK.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found via https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.230016.

Supplement Fig. 1

Risk of Bias 2.0 for quality assessment.

wjmh-42-133-s001.pdf (83.2KB, pdf)
Supplement Fig. 2

Frequentist network meta-analysis. (A) Curvature dgree, (B) plaque size, (C) IIEF_sub network 1, (D) IIEF_sub network 2. MD: mean difference, SMD: standadized mean difference, CI: confidence interval, IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function, PTT: penile traction therapy, ESWT: extracorporeal shockwave treatment, CCH: collagenase clostridium histolyticum, CoQ10: coenzyme Q10.

wjmh-42-133-s002.pdf (127.7KB, pdf)
Supplement Fig. 3

Funnel plots of publication bias. (A) Curvature dgree, (B) plaque size, (C) IIEF_sub network 1, (D) IIEF_sub network 2. IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function.

wjmh-42-133-s003.pdf (250.8KB, pdf)
Supplement Table 1

Search queries

wjmh-42-133-s004.pdf (67.5KB, pdf)
REFERENCES
wjmh-42-133-s005.pdf (127.3KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Chung E, Ralph D, Kagioglu A, Garaffa G, Shamsodini A, Bivalacqua T, et al. Evidence-based management guidelines on Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2016;13:905–923. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.04.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Di Maida F, Cito G, Lambertini L, Valastro F, Morelli G, Mari A, et al. The natural history of Peyronie’s disease. World J Mens Health. 2021;39:399–405. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chung E, De Young L, Brock GB. Rat as an animal model for Peyronie’s disease research: a review of current methods and the peer-reviewed literature. Int J Impot Res. 2011;23:235–241. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2011.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gonzalez-Cadavid NF. Mechanisms of penile fibrosis. J Sex Med. 2009;6 Suppl 3:353–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01195.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gonzalez-Cadavid NF, Rajfer J. Mechanisms of disease: new insights into the cellular and molecular pathology of Peyronie’s disease. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2005;2:291–297. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mulhall JP, Anderson MS, Lubrano T, Shankey TV. Peyronie’s disease cell culture models: phenotypic, genotypic and functional analyses. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:397–405. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Herati AS, Pastuszak AW. The genetic basis of Peyronie disease: a review. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2015.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chung E, Wang R, Ralph D, Levine L, Brock G. A worldwide survey on Peyronie’s disease surgical practice patterns among surgeons. J Sex Med. 2018;15:568–575. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chung E. Penile reconstructive surgery in Peyronie disease: challenges in restoring normal penis size, shape, and function. World J Mens Health. 2020;38:1–8. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.170056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Russo GI, Cacciamani G, Cocci A, Kessler TM, Morgia G, Serefoglu EC, et al. EAU-YAU Men’s Health Working Group. Comparative effectiveness of intralesional therapy for Peyronie’s disease in controlled clinical studies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2019;16:289–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bakr AM, El-Sakka AI. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in Peyronie’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2021;18:1705–1714. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pyrgidis N, Yafi FA, Sokolakis I, Dimitriadis F, Mykoniatis I, Russo GI, et al. Assessment of conservative combination therapies for active and stable Peyronie’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8:1520–1530. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:777–784. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shim SR, Kim SJ, Lee J, Rücker G. Network meta-analysis: application and practice using R software. Epidemiol Health. 2019;41:e2019013. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2019013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cochrane Methods Bisas. RoB 2: a revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials [Internet] London: Cochrane; c2011. [cited 2022 Jun 6]. Available from: https://methods.cochrane.org/bias/resources/rob-2-revised-cochrane-risk-bias-tool-randomized-trials . [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oh SH, Lee DW, Choi YB, Lee YH, Ju JS. Measurement of autophagy flux in benign prostatic hyperplasia in vitro. Prostate Int. 2020;8:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2019.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.El-Sakka AI, Hassoba HM, Chui RM, Bhatnagar RS, Dahiya R, Lue TF. An animal model of Peyronie’s-like condition associated with an increase of transforming growth factor beta mRNA and protein expression. J Urol. 1997;158:2284–2290. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)68236-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.El-Sakka AI, Salabas E, Dinçer M, Kadioglu A. The pathophysiology of Peyronie’s disease. Arab J Urol. 2013;11:272–277. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu RM, Desai LP. Reciprocal regulation of TGF-β and reactive oxygen species: a perverse cycle for fibrosis. Redox Biol. 2015;6:565–577. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Krakhotkin DV, Chernylovskyi VA, Mottrie A, Greco F, Bugaev RA. New insights into the pathogenesis of Peyronie’s disease: a narrative review. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2020;6:165–181. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2020.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rockey DC, Bell PD, Hill JA. Fibrosis--a common pathway to organ injury and failure. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1138–1149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1300575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rosenbloom J, Castro SV, Jimenez SA. Narrative review: fibrotic diseases: cellular and molecular mechanisms and novel therapies. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:159–166. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-3-201002020-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chung E, Brock G. Penile traction therapy and Peyronie’s disease: a state of art review of the current literature. Ther Adv Urol. 2013;5:59–65. doi: 10.1177/1756287212454932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ibrahim A, Gazzard L, Alharbi M, Rompré-Brodeur A, Aube M, Carrier S. Evaluation of oral pentoxifylline, colchicine, and penile traction for the management of Peyronie’s disease. Sex Med. 2019;7:459–463. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2019.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Qian A, Meals RA, Rajfer J, Gonzalez-Cadavid NF. Comparison of gene expression profiles between Peyronie’s disease and Dupuytren’s contracture. Urology. 2004;64:399–404. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ernster L, Dallner G. Biochemical, physiological and medical aspects of ubiquinone function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1271:195–204. doi: 10.1016/0925-4439(95)00028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Folkers K, Osterborg A, Nylander M, Morita M, Mellstedt H. Activities of vitamin Q10 in animal models and a serious deficiency in patients with cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;234:296–299. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yamamoto Y, Yamashita S, Fujisawa A, Kokura S, Yoshikawa T. Oxidative stress in patients with hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatoma evaluated by plasma antioxidants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;247:166–170. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moussa M, Abou Chakra M, Moussa Y. Advances in stem cell therapy for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2020;9:10–13. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2019.01130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Atala A. Recent applications of regenerative medicine to urologic structures and related tissues. Curr Opin Urol. 2006;16:305–309. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000232055.20084.f6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement Fig. 1

Risk of Bias 2.0 for quality assessment.

wjmh-42-133-s001.pdf (83.2KB, pdf)
Supplement Fig. 2

Frequentist network meta-analysis. (A) Curvature dgree, (B) plaque size, (C) IIEF_sub network 1, (D) IIEF_sub network 2. MD: mean difference, SMD: standadized mean difference, CI: confidence interval, IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function, PTT: penile traction therapy, ESWT: extracorporeal shockwave treatment, CCH: collagenase clostridium histolyticum, CoQ10: coenzyme Q10.

wjmh-42-133-s002.pdf (127.7KB, pdf)
Supplement Fig. 3

Funnel plots of publication bias. (A) Curvature dgree, (B) plaque size, (C) IIEF_sub network 1, (D) IIEF_sub network 2. IIEF: International Index of Erectile Function.

wjmh-42-133-s003.pdf (250.8KB, pdf)
Supplement Table 1

Search queries

wjmh-42-133-s004.pdf (67.5KB, pdf)
REFERENCES
wjmh-42-133-s005.pdf (127.3KB, pdf)

Articles from The World Journal of Men's Health are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology

RESOURCES