Table 2.
Effects of implementing a 20% increase in TFP for ASF on consumption per adult equivalent—% change.
| Simulation 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Quintiles | Milk (%) | Chicken (%) | Eggs (%) | Meat (%) |
| Rural | Quintile 1 (poorest) | 5.9 | 4.8 | 5.6 | 3.2 |
| Quintile 2 | 5.7 | 4.9 | 4.1 | 3.2 | |
| Quintile 3 | 5.4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 2.9 | |
| Quintile 4 | 5.4 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 2.9 | |
| Quintile 5 (richest) | 5.1 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 2.4 | |
| Urban | Quintile 1 (poorest) | 5.3 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 1.8 |
| Quintile 2 | 6.7 | 5.5 | 5.8 | 4.5 | |
| Quintile 3 | 5.5 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 2.4 | |
| Quintile 4 | 5.6 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 2.5 | |
| Quintile 5 (richest) | 5.6 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.1 | |
| Simulation 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural | Quintile 1 (poorest) | 6.6 | 12.6 | 16.3 | 5.6 |
| Quintile 2 | 6.8 | 13.1 | 12.4 | 6.1 | |
| Quintile 3 | 6.6 | 13.1 | 14.5 | 6.0 | |
| Quintile 4 | 6.5 | 12.6 | 12.7 | 5.8 | |
| Quintile 5 (richest) | 5.7 | 11.2 | 10.3 | 4.6 | |
| Urban | Quintile 1 (poorest) | 5.2 | 8.4 | 11.6 | 3.4 |
| Quintile 2 | 6.6 | 11.3 | 13.7 | 6.0 | |
| Quintile 3 | 5.5 | 9.2 | 10.7 | 4.1 | |
| Quintile 4 | 6.0 | 9.8 | 10.2 | 4.8 | |
| Quintile 5 (richest) | 5.3 | 8.6 | 8.3 | 3.3 | |
| Simulation 3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural | Quintile 1 (poorest) | 7.6 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 5.9 |
| Quintile 2 | 7.3 | 5.0 | 3.4 | 5.8 | |
| Quintile 3 | 6.9 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 5.4 | |
| Quintile 4 | 7.0 | 4.8 | 3.5 | 5.6 | |
| Quintile 5 (richest) | 6.9 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 5.3 | |
| Urban | Quintile 1 (poorest) | 7.9 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 6.1 |
| Quintile 2 | 9.9 | 7.7 | 7.0 | 9.5 | |
| Quintile 3 | 8.1 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 6.7 | |
| Quintile 4 | 8.2 | 4.7 | 3.4 | 6.8 | |
| Quintile 5 (richest) | 8.5 | 4.7 | 3.0 | 6.8 | |
Abbreviations: ASF, animal‐source foods; TFP, total factor productivity.