Table 1.
Fit indices and profile distributions for different latent profile solutions.
| Fit indices | Profile proportion (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIC | BIC | SABIC | Entropy | LMR-LRT | Max | Min | ||
| Men (n = 315) | 2 Profiles | 15057.68 | 15286.59 | 15093.11 | 0.87 | p = 0.15 | 57.46 | 42.54 |
| 3 Profiles | 14559.39 | 14867.10 | 14607.02 | 0.92 | p < 0.01 | 53.33 | 19.68 | |
| 4 Profiles | 14336.48 | 14722.99 | 14396.31 | 0.91 | p < 0.05 | 40.32 | 15.56 | |
| 5 Profiles | 14144.89 | 14610.21 | 14216.92 | 0.91 | p = 0.30 | 38.41 | 4.76 | |
| Women (n = 305) | 2 Profiles | 15023.37 | 15250.31 | 15056.85 | 0.93 | p < 0.001 | 71.80 | 28.20 |
| 3 Profiles | 14801.98 | 15107.04 | 14846.00 | 0.91 | p = 0.22 | 56.07 | 17.38 | |
| 4 Profiles | 14631.04 | 15014.23 | 14687.56 | 0.88 | p = 0.75 | 41.97 | 16.39 | |
| 5 Profiles | 14497.93 | 14959.25 | 14565.98 | 0.91 | p = 0.45 | 31.80 | 14.10 | |
Note: AIC, Akaike Information Criteria; BIC, Bayesian Information Criteria; SABIC, sample adjusted BIC; LMR-LRT, Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test.