Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 11.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ Rev. 2018 Aug;108(8):2048–2087.

Figure 10. Pass-Through and Market Concentration.

Figure 10.

Notes: Figure shows coefficients on distance-to-floor × year 2003 interactions from several difference-in-differences regressions. The dependent variable is the mean premium defined as in Figure 4. Each point represents a coefficient from a separate regression in which the estimation sample is stratified by market concentration in the pre-BIPA period. In panel A, counties are binned according to the tercile of insurer HHI in plan year 2000. In panel B, counties are binned according to the number of insurers operating in the county in plan year 2000. Competition increases to the right of both panels. The unit of observation is the county × year, and observations are weighted by the number of beneficiaries in the county. While the analysis is conducted on segments of the data, the underlying sample is the unbalanced panel of county-years with at least one MA plan over years 1997 to 2003. This sample includes 4,262 of 22,001 possible county-years and 64 percent of all Medicare beneficiary-years. Controls are identical to those in Figure 3. The capped vertical bars show 95 percent confidence intervals calculated using standard errors clustered at the county level. Horizontal dashed lines are plotted at the reference values of 0 and −1, where −1 corresponds to 100 percent pass-through.