Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 11;33(1):281–290. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03505-y

Box 1.

Summary of findings across case studies

Case Study 1:
• Involving clinical and non-clinical team members, researchers and patients in the design was advantageous
• Continuous evaluation of patient needs and expectations would have been beneficial
• Patient adherence appears to be influenced by the participation of clinical teams in the PROM findings
• The burden of PROM completion needs to be balanced with the functional impacts of illness
Case Study 2:
• Patients completed the PROM for a variety of reasons
• Clinical team engagement with PROM findings was a major influence to PROM completion by patients
• Self-management advice and symptom tracking were other motivators for PROM completion
• Completion rates for repeated measures dropped over time
Case Study 3:
• Patients reported greater physician communication and shared decision making when the PROM information was discussed
• PROM completion supports patient engagement in healthcare