. 2024 Jan 12;24:22. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02404-0

Table 4.

Comparison of the FLACC score and Ramsay score of the three groups at different time points (x ± s)

	groups	number	T1	T2	T3	T4	T5
FLACC scores	Group C Group N1 Group N2	30 30 30	7.2 ± 2.8 4.8 ± 2.1^a 4.1 ± 2.6^a	5.9 ± 2.8 3.2 ± 2.0^a 2.4 ± 2.3^a	5.0 ± 2.5 2.3 ± 1.7^a 1.9 ± 1.7^a	3.7 ± 2.1 2.0 ± 1.5^a 1.5 ± 1.8^a	3.0 ± 2.0 1.9 ± 1.7^a 1.5 ± 1.9^a
Ramsay scores	Group C Group N1 Group N2	30 30 30	1.5 ± 1.0 2.1 ± 1.4 2.7 ± 1.4^a	2.3 ± 1.3 2.8 ± 1.5 3.3 ± 1.2^a	2.0 ± 1.1 3.2 ± 1.2^a 3.1 ± 1.1^a	2.6 ± 1.2 3.3 ± 1.3^a 3.7 ± 1.2^a	2.3 ± 1.0 2.4 ± 1.2 3.2 ± 1.4^ab

groups

number

FLACC

scores

Group C

Group N1

Group N2

7.2 ± 2.8

4.8 ± 2.1^a

4.1 ± 2.6^a

5.9 ± 2.8

3.2 ± 2.0^a

2.4 ± 2.3^a

5.0 ± 2.5

2.3 ± 1.7^a

1.9 ± 1.7^a

3.7 ± 2.1

2.0 ± 1.5^a

1.5 ± 1.8^a

3.0 ± 2.0

1.9 ± 1.7^a

1.5 ± 1.9^a

Ramsay

scores

Group C

Group N1

Group N2

1.5 ± 1.0

2.1 ± 1.4

2.7 ± 1.4^a

2.3 ± 1.3

2.8 ± 1.5

3.3 ± 1.2^a

2.0 ± 1.1

3.2 ± 1.2^a

3.1 ± 1.1^a

2.6 ± 1.2

3.3 ± 1.3^a

3.7 ± 1.2^a

2.3 ± 1.0

2.4 ± 1.2

3.2 ± 1.4^ab

Compared with Group C, ap < 0.05; Bp < 0.05 compared with the N1 group