Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 12;24:62. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11818-5

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for PFS in newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL

Parameters Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Sex (male vs. female) 1.11 0.87–1.42 0.408
Age (> 60 vs. ≤60) 1.16 0.90–1.48 0.248
Ann Arbor Stage (III–IV vs. I–II) 2.66 1.96–3.60 < 0.001 1.71 1.21–2.43 0.003
Extranodal disease (>1 vs. ≤1) 2.18 1.71–2.77 < 0.001 1.49 1.14–1.95 0.003
ECOG score (2–4 vs. 0–1) 2.00 1.54–2.60 < 0.001 1.44 1.09–1.91 0.011
LDH (>ULN vs. normal) 2.15 1.68–2.75 < 0.001 1.41 1.06–1.87 0.019
B symptoms (present vs. absent) 1.64 1.27–2.12 < 0.001 1.13 0.85–1.50 0.421
Serum ApoA1 (high vs. low) 0.62 0.48–0.78 < 0.001 0.98 0.75–1.29 0.902
Subtype (non-GCB vs. GCB) 1.76 1.33–2.33 < 0.001 1.47 1.18–1.84 0.001
Regimen (CHOP-like vs. R-CHOP-like) 1.58 1.16–2.15 0.004 1.75 1.28–2.39 < 0.001

CI Confidence interval, HR Hazard ratio, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, LDH Lactate dehydrogenase, ULN Upper limit of normal, ApoA1 Apolipoprotein A1, GCB Germinal center B-cell-like