Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 3;11(1):46–55. doi: 10.1093/nop/npad064

Table 2.

Positive Actions to Promote Gender Equality for Women

Question and answers, n (%) All respondents
(n = 262)
Women*
(n = 141)
Men*
(n = 115)
Do you agree with positive action to enforce the role of women in neuro-oncology?
 Not at all 5 (1.9%) 2 (1.4%) 3 (2.6%)
 A little 15 (5.7%) 9 (6.4%) 6 (5.2%)
 Neutral 61 (23.3%) 25 (17.7%) 34 (29.6%)
 Quite a bit 60 (22.9%) 31 (22.0%) 28 (24.3%)
 Very much 120 (45.8%) 74 (52.2%) 43 (37.4%)
 Missing 1 (0.4%) 1 (0.9%)
When a gender balance issue has been identified, do you believe that the gender balance should be addressed:
 Immediately 121 (46.2%) 68 (48.2%) 50 (43.5%)
 Within 1–5 years 77 (29.4%) 48 (34.0%) 28 (24.3%)
 Within 6–10 years 9 (3.4%) 6 (4.3%) 2 (1.7%)
 No opinion 54 (20.6%) 19 (13.5%) 34 (29.6%)
 Missing 1 (0.4%) - 1 (0.9%)
Do you agree that higher positions with responsibilities should be fulfilled only by people who work full-time?
 Not at all 112 (42.7%) 68 (48.2%) 42 (36.5%)
 A little 32 (12.2%) 20 (14.2%) 12 (10.4%)
 Neutral 37 (14.1%) 16 (11.3%) 19 (16.5%)
 Quite a bit 46 (17.6%) 22 (15.6%) 23 (20.0%)
 Very much 34 (13.0%) 15 (10.6%) 18 (15.7%)
 Missing 1 (0.4%) - 1 (0.9%)
Do you agree that women only should be considered for certain roles until the optimal gender balance has been reached?
 Not at all 146 (55.7%) 69 (48.9%) 73 (63.5%)
 A little 3 (11.5%) 20 (14.2%) 10 (8.7%)
 Neutral 58 (22.1%) 34 (24.1%) 22 (19.1%)
 Quite a bit 18 (6.9%) 12 (8.5%) 6 (5.2%)
 Very much 10 (3.8%) 6 (4.3%) 4 (3.5%)
Which roles would this be appropriate for?
 Department chair 109 (41.6%) 65 (46.1%) 41 (35.7%)
 Assistant or associate professor 98 (37.4%) 56 (39.7%) 40 (34.8%)
 Senior physician 80 (30.5%) 41 (29.1%) 37 (32.2%)
 Medical student 27 (10.3%) 10 (7.1%) 15 (13.0%)
Do you agree that women with an inferior CV quality for a specific position should be given a position when gender balance needs to be reached?
 Not at all 172 (65.6%) 91 (64.5%) 79 (68.7%)
 A little 41 (15.6%) 21 (14.9%) 17 (14.8%)
 Neutral 37 (14.1%) 22 (15.6%) 14 (12.2%)
 Quite a bit 8 (3.1%) 4 (2.8%) 4 (3.5%)
 Very much 3 (1.1%) 2 (1.4%) 1 (0.9%)
 Missing 1 (0.4%) 1 (0.7%) -
Do you agree that women with an equivalent CV quality for a specific position should be given a position when gender balance needs to be reached?
 Not at all 27 (10.3%) 11 (7.8%) 16 (13.9%)
 A little 31 (11.8%) 20 (14.2%) 9 (7.8%)
 Neutral 40 (15.3%) 19 (13.5%) 19 (16.5%)
 Quite a bit 75 (28.6%) 39 (27.7%) 35 (30.4%)
 Very much 87 (33.2%) 52 (36.9%) 34 (29.6%)
 Missing 2 (0.8%) - 2 (1.7%)
Do you agree that women should be put under pressure to accept a position with a high level of responsibility if gender balance needs to be reached?
 Not at all 176 (67.2%) 91 (64.5%) 82 (71.3%)
 A little 21 (8.0%) 14 (9.9%) 5 (4.3%)
 Neutral 32 (12.2%) 16 (11.3%) 16 (13.9%)
 Quite a bit 19 (7.3%) 11 (7.8%) 8 (7.0%)
 Very much 10 (3.8%) 7 (5.0%) 2 (1.7%)
 Missing 4 (4.5%) 2 (1.4%) 2 (1.7%)
Do you agree that there is a risk of limiting career opportunities for women by developing special gender equality rules?
 Not at all 78 (29.8%) 46 (32.6%) 31 (27.0%)
 A little 53 (20.2%) 26 (18.4%) 26 (22.6%)
 Neutral 75 (28.6%) 43 (30.5%) 30 (20.6%)
 Quite a bit 30 (11.5%) 13 (9.2%) 17 (14.8%)
 Very much 21 (8.0%) 10 (7.1%) 9 (7.8%)
 Missing 5 (1.9%) 3 (2.1%) 2 (1.7%)
If in the future the balance would favor women at higher positions, would you agree to apply positive action for men?
 Not at all 37 (14.1%) 13 (9.2%) 22 (19.1%)
 A little 38 (14.5%) 17 (12.1%) 20 (17.4%)
 Neutral 71 (27.1%) 38 (27.0%) 32 (27.8%)
 Quite a bit 66 (25.2%) 45 (31.9%) 20 (17.4%)
 Very much 46 (17.6%) 26 (18.4%) 19 (19.5%)
 Missing 4 (1.5%) 2 (1.4%) 2 (1.7%)

*Sex was missing for 3 respondents and 3 other respondents did not disclose their sex. These respondents are not included in this analysis.

P-value < .05.

P-value < 0.01 (for the comparison between females and males).