Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Mach Intell. 2023 Mar 13;5(3):284–293. doi: 10.1038/s42256-023-00627-3

Figure 2: Model comparison and validation of mNODE on synthetic data generated by the microbial consumer-resource model.

Figure 2:

The predictive performance of mNODE is compared to other methods through three metrics: a1 the mean SCC (Spearman Correlation Coefficient) ρ, a2 the top-5 mean SCC ρ5, and a3 the number of metabolites with an SCC larger than 0.5 Nρ>0.5. b1-b3 The predictive performance of mNODE as a function of training sample size when the nutrient sampling probability (i.e. the fraction of nutrients externally supplied) pn=0.6 and the species sampling probability (i.e. the fraction of species introduced) ps=0.5. c1-c3 The predictive performance of mNODE when the training sample size is 240 and the species sampling probability ps=0.5. Solid lines with circles are predicted results when nutrient supply rates (i.e. diets in the microbial consumer-resource model) are not included in the input of mNODE. Dashed lines with triangles are predicted results when nutrient supply rates are included in the input of mNODE.