Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Mach Intell. 2023 Mar 13;5(3):284–293. doi: 10.1038/s42256-023-00627-3

Figure 3: Performance comparison between mNODE and existing methods on real microbial community datasets.

Figure 3:

Three metrics are adopted for comparing model performances: the mean SCC ρ, the top-50 mean SCC ρ50, and the number of metabolites with SCCs larger than 0.5 Nρ>0.5. All datasets21,3338 are randomly divided into training and test sets with the 80/20 ratio except for the PRISM and NLIBD dataset33. a1-a3 Performance of methods after training on the PRISM and test on the NLIBD33. b1-b3 Performance of methods on the data from lung samples of patients with cystic fibrosis21. c1-c3 Performance of methods on the data from soil biocrust samples after 5 wetting events34. d1-d3 Performance of methods on the data from fecal samples of children at age33538. e1-e3 Performance of methods on the data from blood plasma samples of children at age 33538.