Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 12;17:17562848231222332. doi: 10.1177/17562848231222332

Table 2a.

Switch rates and patterns among German patients with IBD who switched from biosimilar ABP 501 to another targeted therapy during the first 12 months after initiating ABP 501.

Evaluated variable All patients ADA-naïve patients ADA-experienced patients
All patients, n 3362 1828 1534
Total switched patients, n (%) 763 (22.7) 374 (20.5) 389 (25.4)
Initial switching patterns post-ABP 501, n (%)
 ADA reference product 221 (29.0) 38 (10.2) 183 (47.0) a
 ADA biosimilars (excluding ABP 501) 126 (16.5) 35 (9.4) 91 (23.4) b
 Non-ADA TNFi 74 (9.7) 57 (15.2) 17 (4.4)
 Non-TNFi biologics 314 (41.2) 220 (58.8) 94 (24.2)
  IL1 inhibitor 1 (0.1) 1 (0.3) 0 (0.0)
  IL12/23 inhibitor 168 (22.0) 110 (29.4) 58 (14.9)
  IL17 inhibitors 2 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 2 (0.5)
  IL6 inhibitors 1 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3)
 Integrin antagonists 142 (18.6) 109 (29.1) 33 (8.5)
 JAKi 28 (3.7) 24 (6.4) 4 (1.0)

ADA, adalimumab; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IL, interleukin; JAKi, Janus Kinase inhibitor; RP, reference product; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor.

a

Included patients who were treated with RP (n = 165, 90.2%) or other ADA biosimilars (n = 18, 9.8%) prior to initiation of ABP 501.

b

Included patients who were treated with RP (n = 65, 71.4%) or other ADA biosimilars (n = 26, 28.6%) prior to initiation of ABP 501.