Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 16;2015(1):CD009831. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009831.pub2

Comparison 3. Subgroup analyses.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Subgroup analysis ‐ different antipsychotic drugs (short term) 40 2132 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.87, 1.00]
1.1 Bromperidol 8 458 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.88, 1.15]
1.2 Clopenthixol 2 92 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.52, 1.12]
1.3 Droperidol 2 85 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.73, 1.04]
1.4 Flupenthixol 1 21 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.08 [0.01, 1.32]
1.5 Fluphenazine 3 157 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.37, 1.65]
1.6 Loxapine 3 162 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.12 [0.87, 1.44]
1.7 Molindone 1 30 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.13 [0.01, 2.25]
1.8 Nemonapride 1 167 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.55 [0.33, 0.93]
1.9 Perphenazine 1 39 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.7 [0.41, 1.20]
1.10 Pimozide 3 72 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.09 [0.74, 1.61]
1.11 Pipotiazine 3 134 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.39, 2.02]
1.12 Sulpiride 1 74 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.83 [0.50, 1.39]
1.13 Tiopropazate 1 86 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.07 [0.73, 1.57]
1.14 Thiothixene 2 83 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.70, 1.52]
1.15 Timiperone 1 206 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.57, 1.11]
1.16 Trifluoperazine 4 124 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.68, 1.50]
1.17 Trifluperidol 1 39 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.53, 1.71]
1.18 Zuclopenthixol 2 103 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.94 [0.70, 1.28]
2 Subgroup analysis ‐ different antipsychotic drugs (medium term) 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.51 [0.37, 0.69]
2.1 Thiothixene 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.51 [0.37, 0.69]
3 Subgroup analysis ‐ treatment‐resistant participants (short term) 40 2132 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.87, 1.00]
3.1 Trials with treatment‐resistant participants 3 130 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.46 [0.66, 3.23]
3.2 Trials without treatment‐resistant participants 37 2002 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.87, 1.00]