Fig. 5.

Decoding hand and wrist movements in a continuous EMG dataset. A Dynamic cue shifting significantly improved accuracy compared to no cue shift (Cue shift: paired t-test Dynamic vs. None, p = 0.020). There was no significant difference between a dynamic cue shift and static 800-ms cue shift (approximately the average cue shift across subjects) (Cue shift: paired t-test Dynamic vs. Static 800 ms, p = 0.22). B Confusion matrix detailing performance from one subject in the continuous dataset. C Time series plot depicting decoder class probabilities across time. The presented cue is shown in above the time series plot as a rectangular colored bar with the color corresponding to the movement class