TABLE 3.
Region | Period | Overall rates | Age‐standardized rates | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | |||
China 36 , 53 | 2003–2005 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 16.10 | 15.40 | 17.40 | |
2006–2008 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 15.80 | 14.50 | 18.30 | ||
2009–2011 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 16.80 | 15.20 | 19.90 | ||
2012–2015 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 19.70 | 16.80 | 25.10 | ||
Fujian | Total 54 | 2012–2014 | 15.33 | 13.44 | 19.94 | 14.98 | 13.36 | 19.33 |
Xiamen 55 | 2011–2014 | 11.98 | 9.44 | 18.86 | 11.32 | 9.00 | 18.07 | |
2015–2018 | 14.17 | 12.15 | 18.70 | 13.83 | 12.21 | 18.55 | ||
Guangdong | Zhongshan 57 , 58 | 1995–1999 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 7.10 | ‐ | ‐ |
2000–2004 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 10.40 | ‐ | ‐ | ||
2005–2009 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 12.80 | ‐ | ‐ | ||
2010–2013 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 16.80 | ‐ | ‐ | ||
Sihui 8 | 2007–2009 | 12.22 | 10.55 | 16.26 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
Hebei | Cixian 9 | 2000–2002 | 7.23 | 6.96 | 7.73 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
Jiangsu | Qidong 49 , 60 | 1992–1996 | ‐ | 5.51 | 6.74 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
1997–2000 | ‐ | 8.87 | 13.95 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ||
2001–2007 | 12.73 | 11.73 | 15.21 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ||
Jiangyin 59 | 2012–2013 | 27.51 | 27.90 | 31.62 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
Macao 56 | 2003–2005 | 21.00 | 20.00 | 23.00 | ||||
Shandong | Linqu 49 | 1993–1999 | ‐ | 9.00 | 9.40 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ |
Zhaoyuan 11 | 2009–2013 | 15.46 | 14.57 | 18.01 | ||||
Shanghai 12 | 2002–2006 | 20.23 | 20.27 | 22.11 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
Zhejiang | Haining and Jiashan 61 | 2003–2006 | 14.20 | 14.10 | 14.60 | 14.80 | ‐ | ‐ |
2007–2010 | 13.40 | 11.70 | 18.10 | 14.20 | ‐ | ‐ | ||
2011–2014 | 18.10 | 15.20 | 25.00 | 16.40 | ‐ | ‐ | ||
Taiwan 32 | 2000–2004 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 11.60 | ‐ | ‐ | |
2005–2009 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 16.00 | ‐ | ‐ | ||
2010–2014 | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | 20.60 | ‐ | ‐ |
Note: ‐ No report or nonavailable in the original articles.