Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 15;25:27. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05622-4

Table 3.

Results of the proposed and baseline models with 700 genes for molecular subtype classification on the TCGA pan-cancer dataset and cancer subtype classificaiton on the TCGA BRCA dataset

Model Pan-cancer BRCA
Accu.a F1 Accu.a F1
Proposed w/ GAT 83.9% ± 1.4% 0.84 ± 0.01 86.4% ± 1.9% 0.87 ± 0.02
Proposed w/ GCN 81.2% ± 0.6% 0.81 ± 0.01 83.8% ± 0.9% 0.84 ± 0.01
FC-NN 78.4% ± 0.8% 0.75 ± 0.02 80.8% ± 1.1% 0.80 ± 0.02
GCN (Original) [23] 77.6% ± 0.9% 0.76 ± 0.02 82.8% ± 1.2% 0.84 ± 0.01
GCN (Modified) 78.5% ± 1.2% 0.77 ± 0.02 81.8% ± 1.4% 0.82 ± 0.01
Multi-omics GCN (Original) [1] 78.6% ± 0.9% 0.78 ± 0.01 81.8% ± 1.1% 0.82 ± 0.01
Multi-omics GCN (Modified) 80.2% ± 0.8% 0.79 ± 0.01 82.8% ± 0.9% 0.83 ± 0.01
GrAMME (Modified) [25] 81.4% ± 1.3% 0.81 ± 0.03 82.8% ± 1.6% 0.84 ± 0.03
Multi-omics GAT (Original) [7] 76.3% ± 1.2% 0.76 ± 0.02 81.8% ± 1.3% 0.82 ± 0.02
Multi-omics GAT (Modified) 79.7% ± 1.3% 0.79 ± 0.02 82.8% ± 1.4% 0.84 ± 0.02

The bold font indicates the highest values and the values after ± sign are the standard deviations.

aAccu. stands for Accuracy