Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 15;25:27. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05622-4

Table 7.

Results of the proposed model on different combinations of omics and networks at 500 genes using the TCGA pan-cancer dataset

Data Network GAT GCN
Accu.e F1 Accu.e F1
mRNAa Intra-omicc 77.0% ± 1.9% 0.75 ± 0.03 76.1% ± 0.9% 0.73 ± 0.01
miRNAb Intra-omicd 74.0% ± 0.4% 0.70 ± 0.01 68.2% ± 4.1% 0.63 ± 0.04
mRNA+CNVa Intra-omicc 79.1% ± 1.4% 0.77 ± 0.03 77.1% ± 0.7% 0.76 ± 0.01
mRNA+miRNA Inter-omic 76.1% ± 1.6% 0.73 ± 0.03 75.4% ± 0.7% 0.73 ± 0.01
Intra-omic 77.3% ± 1.6% 0.75 ± 0.03 76.8% ± 0.7% 0.74 ± 0.01
mRNA+CNV+miRNA Inter-omic 80.3% ± 1.6% 0.80 ± 0.02 77.4% ± 0.6% 0.74 ± 0.01
Intra-omic 80.5% ± 1.2% 0.80 ± 0.02 78.2% ± 0.6% 0.75 ± 0.01

The bold font indicates the highest values and the values after ± sign are the standard deviations.

aData contains no miRNA-based nodes, so only 500 gene nodes in the graph

bData contains no gene-based nodes, so only 100 miRNA nodes in the graph

cThe graph contains only gene-gene connections

dThe graph contains only miRNA-miRNA meta-path connections

eAccu. stands for accuracy