Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 15;13:4. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01358-1

Table 3.

Selected WHO IPC CC training participant responses to attitude statements in DRC and BF, 2021–2022§

Statement Facility A (N = 22)¥ Facility B (N = 24)¥
Baseline Median (IQR) Follow-up Median (IQR) p-value* Baseline Median (IQR) Follow-up Median (IQR) p-value*
I can dedicate time to participating in an infection prevention and control (IPC) program. 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.157 7.0 (6.0–7.0) 7.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.329
I have seen evidence that IPC programmes can control the spread of infection in health care facilities. 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 7.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.056 7.0 (6.5-7.0) 7.0 (7.0–7.0) 0.059
I know the core components of an IPC programme (i.e. World Health Organization guidelines). 5.0 (3.0–6.0) 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.001 5.0 (2.5-7.0) 7.0 (7.0–7.0) < 0.001
Involvement in an IPC programme is one of my responsibilities. 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 7.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.019 7.0 (5.5-7.0) 7.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.033
It is important to use IPC guidelines on specific procedures. 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.479 7.0 (6.0–7.0) 7.0 (7.0–7.0) 0.025
An IPC programme will protect my own health. 6.5 (6.0–7.0) 6.5 (6.0–7.0) 1.000 7.0 (6.0–7.0) 7.0 (7.0–7.0) 0.008
It is important to my facility to have an active IPC team 7.0 (6.0–7.0) 7.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.412 7.0 (7.0–7.0) 7.0 (7.0–7.0) 0.174
My facility has sufficient funds to support an active IPC programme. 3.0 (2.0–4.0) 5.0 (2.0–5.0) 0.038 4.0 (3.0-5.5) 5.0 (3.5-6.0) 0.450
Senior leadership promotes the formation of an IPC programme at my facility. 6.0 (5.5–6.5) 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.375 6.0 (5.0–7.0) 6.0 (5.0–7.0) 0.323
There are no barriers to implementing an IPC programme in my facility. 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 6.0 (5.0–6.0) 0.531 6.0 (5.0-6.5) 3.5 (2.0–5.0) < 0.001
An IPC programme can function in my facility over a long period of time. 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.477 6.0 (6.0–7)0.0 6.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.324
An IPC programme will protect the health of patients. 6.5 (6.0–7.0) 7.0 (6.0–7.0) 0.705 7.0 (7.0–7.0) 7.0 (7.0–7.0) 0.180
In my facility, there is adequate access to personal protective equipment (gowns, masks, gloves, eye protection). 5.0 (5.0–6.0) 6.0 (5.0–7.0) 0.047 5.0 (5.0–6.0) 5.0 (5.0–6.0) 0.285

¥Median and quartile range according to Likert scale responses (completely disagree = 1, disagree = 2, somewhat disagree = 3, neutral = 4, somewhat agree = 5, agree = 6, completely agree = 7)

*p-value calculated using a paired analysis with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test

§ Abbreviations: Burkina Faso (BF), Core Component (CC), Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Infection Prevention and Control (IPC), Interquartile Range (IQR), World Health Organization (WHO)