Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 15;24:60. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04672-4

Table 2.

Primary and secondary outcomes in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population

Outcome Study arm
Control group
T1: n = 97, T2: n = 82
Intervention group
T1: n = 105, T2: n = 85
Time Median IQR Median IQR p
T1 SPPB 3.00 [2.00–5.00] 4.00 [3.00–5.00] 0.308a
Frailty scale 5.00 [4.00–6.00] 5.00 [3.00–6.00] 0.281b
Clock test 3.00 [2.00–4.00] 3.00 [2.00–4.00] 0.799 b
EQ-5D 5L VAS 55.00 [45.00–75.00] 50.00 [45.00–70.00] 0.355 b
FES-I 28.00 [20.00–38.00] 27.00 [21.00–37.00] 0.805 b
T2 SPPB 3.00 [2.00–5.00] 4.00 [2.00–5.00] 0.225 a
Frailty scale 6.00 [4.00–6.00] 5.00 [4.00–6.00] 0.912 b
Clock drawing test 3.00 [2.00–4.00] 3.00 [2.00–4.00] 0.661 b
EQ5D 5L VAS 50.00 [47.50–72.50] 54.00 [50.00–75.00] 0.425 b
FES-I 27.00 [20.00–38.00] 26.00 [20.00–35.00] 0.964 b

IQR Interquartile range, FES-I Falls Efficacy Scale, SPPB Short Physical Performance Battery, VAS Visual Analogue Scale

Informative missing values were replaced by the worst outcome possible

aGeneralised linear model, controlled for the baseline SPPB score

bMann–Whitney U test if the data were not normally distributed