Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 15;18(1):50–59. doi: 10.5009/gnl220490

Table 3.

High-Resolution Manometry

Variable aEE (n=16) EoE (n=25) p-value
IRP, mm Hg 18.8 (9.4–24.6) 16.6 (12.6–22.7) 0.653
LES pressure, mm Hg 29.5 (21.7–35.1) 32.6 (27.4–41.1) 0.492
LES residual pressure, mm Hg 20.1 (11.9–26.7) 16.0 (12.4–22.5) 0.489
UES basal pressure, mm Hg 33.3 (21.5–75.0) 76.6 (59.3–104.3) 0.250
DCI mean, mm Hg·s·cm 2,344 (1,557–3,319) 1,828 (1,071–2,648) 0.219
DCI max, mm Hg·s·cm 3,379 (2,140–4,270) 2,987 (1,741–3,737) 0.635
Contractile front velocity, cm/s 3.7 (3.8–4.0) 4.2 (3.4–5.3) 0.026*
Distal latency, s 7.3 (7.0–8.4) 7.2 (6.9–7.9) 0.910
Abnormal study 7 (43.8) 12 (48.0) 0.755
Ineffective esophageal motility 3 (18.8) 7 (58.3)
EGJ outflow obstruction 4 (25.0) 4 (33.3)
Fragmented peristalsis 0 1 (8.3)

Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

aEE, asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia; EoE, eosinophilic esophagitis; IRP, integrated relaxation pressure; LES, lower esophageal sphincter; UES, upper esophageal sphincter; DCI, distal contractile integral; EGJ, esophagogastric junction.

*p<0.05.